MetaSearch is extensible searching for your form_for enjoyment. It “wraps” one of your ActiveRecord models, providing methods that allow you to build up search conditions against that model, and has a few extra form helpers to simplify sorting and supplying multiple parameters to your condition methods as well.
The successor to MetaSearch is Ransack. It’s got features that MetaSearch doesn’t, along with some API changes. I haven’t had the time to dedicate to making it bulletproof yet, so I’m releasing a 1.1.x branch of MetaSearch to help with migrations to Rails 3.1.
This is intended to be a stopgap measure.
t’s important to note that the long-term migration path for your apps should be toward Ransack, which is written in a more sane manner that will make supporting new versions of Rails much easier going forward.
In your Gemfile:
gem "meta_search" # Last officially released gem # gem "meta_search", :git => "git://github.com/ernie/meta_search.git" # Track git repo
or, to install as a plugin:
rails plugin install git://github.com/ernie/meta_search.git
In your controller:
def index @search = Article.search(params[:search]) @articles = @search.all # load all matching records # @articles = @search.relation # Retrieve the relation, to lazy-load in view # @articles = @search.paginate(:page => params[:page]) # Who doesn't love will_paginate? end
In your view:
<%= form_for @search, :url => articles_path, :html => {:method => :get} do |f| %>
<%= f.label :title_contains %>
<%= f.text_field :title_contains %><br />
<%= f.label :comments_created_at_greater_than, 'With comments after' %>
<%= f.datetime_select :comments_created_at_greater_than, :include_blank => true %><br />
<!-- etc... -->
<%= f.submit %>
<% end %>
Options for the search method are documented at MetaSearch::Searches::ActiveRecord.
Wheres are how MetaSearch does its magic. Wheres have a name (and possible aliases) which are appended to your model and association attributes. When you instantiate a MetaSearch::Builder against a model (manually or by calling your model’s search method) the builder responds to methods named for your model’s attributes and associations, suffixed by the name of the Where.
These are the default Wheres, broken down by the types of ActiveRecord columns they can search against:
-
equals (alias: eq) - Just as it sounds.
-
does_not_equal (aliases: ne, noteq) - The opposite of equals, oddly enough.
-
in - Takes an array, matches on equality with any of the items in the array.
-
not_in (aliases: ni, notin) - Like above, but negated.
-
is_null - The column has an SQL NULL value.
-
is_not_null - The column contains anything but NULL.
-
contains (aliases: like, matches) - Substring match.
-
does_not_contain (aliases: nlike, nmatches) - Negative substring match.
-
starts_with (alias: sw) - Match strings beginning with the entered term.
-
does_not_start_with (alias: dnsw) - The opposite of above.
-
ends_with (alias: ew) - Match strings ending with the entered term.
-
does_not_end_with (alias: dnew) - Negative of above.
-
greater_than (alias: gt) - Greater than.
-
greater_than_or_equal_to (aliases: gte, gteq) - Greater than or equal to.
-
less_than (alias: lt) - Less than.
-
less_than_or_equal_to (aliases: lte, lteq) - Less than or equal to.
-
is_true - Is true. Useful for a checkbox like “only show admin users”.
-
is_false - The complement of is_true.
-
is_present - As with is_true, useful with a checkbox. Not NULL or the empty string.
-
is_blank - Returns records with a value of NULL or the empty string in the column.
So, given a model like this…
class Article < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :author has_many :comments has_many :moderations, :through => :comments end
…you might end up with attributes like title_contains, comments_title_starts_with, moderations_value_less_than, author_name_equals, and so on.
Additionally, all of the above predicate types also have an _any and _all version, which expects an array of the corresponding parameter type, and requires any or all of the parameters to be a match, respectively. So:
Article.search :author_name_starts_with_any => ['Jim', 'Bob', 'Fred']
will match articles authored by Jimmy, Bobby, or Freddy, but not Winifred.
While the most common use case is to simply call Model.search(params), there may be times where you want to scope your search more tightly. For instance, only allowing users to search their own projects (assuming a current_user method returning the current user):
@search = current_user.projects.search(params[:search])
Or, you can build up any relation you like and call the search method on that object:
@projects_with_awesome_users_search = Project.joins(:user).where(:users => {:awesome => true}).search(params[:search])
If you’d like to match on one of several possible columns, you can do this:
<%= f.text_field :title_or_description_contains %> <%= f.text_field :title_or_author_name_starts_with %>
Caveats:
-
Only one match type is supported. You can’t do
title_matches_or_description_starts_withfor instance. -
If you’re matching across associations, remember that the associated table will be INNER JOINed, therefore limiting results to those that at least have a corresponding record in the associated table.
All Where types automatically get an “any” and “all” variant. This has the same name and aliases as the original, but is suffixed with _any and _all, for an “OR” or “AND” search, respectively. So, if you want to provide the user with 5 different search boxes to enter possible article titles:
<%= f.multiparameter_field :title_contains_any,
*5.times.inject([]) {|a, b| a << {:field_type => :text_field}} +
[:size => 10] %>
MetaSearch will allow you to traverse your associations in one form, generating the necessary joins along the way. If you have the following models…
class Company < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :developers end class Developer < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :company has_many :notes end
…you can do this in your form to search your companies by developers with certain notes:
<%= f.text_field :developers_notes_note_contains %>
You can travel forward and back through the associations, so this would also work (though be entirely pointless in this case):
<%= f.text_field :developers_notes_developer_company_name_contains %>
However, to prevent abuse, this is limited to associations of a total “depth” of 5 levels. This means that while starting from a Company model, as above, you could do Company -> :developers -> :notes -> :developer -> :company, which has gotten you right back where you started, but “travels” through 5 models total.
In the case of polymorphic belongs_to associations, things work a bit differently. Let’s say you have the following models:
class Article < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :comments, :as => :commentable end class Post < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :comments, :as => :commentable end class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :commentable, :polymorphic => true validates_presence_of :body end
Your first instinct might be to set up a text field for :commentable_body_contains, but you can’t do this. MetaSearch would have no way to know which class lies on the other side of the polymorphic association, so it wouldn’t be able to join the correct tables.
Instead, you’ll follow a convention Searchlogic users are already familiar with, using the name of the polymorphic association, then the underscored class name (AwesomeClass becomes awesome_class), then the delimiter “type”, to tell MetaSearch anything that follows is an attribute name. For example:
<%= f.text_field :commentable_article_type_body_contains %>
If you’d like to match on multiple types of polymorphic associations, you can join them with _or_, just like any other conditions:
<%= f.text_field :commentable_article_type_body_or_commentable_post_type_body_contains %>
It’s not pretty, but it works. Alternately, consider creating a custom search method as described below to save yourself some typing if you’re creating a lot of these types of search fields.
If none of the built-in search criteria work for you, you can add new Wheres. To do so, create an initializer (/config/initializers/meta_search.rb, for instance) and add lines like:
MetaSearch::Where.add :between, :btw, :predicate => :in, :types => [:integer, :float, :decimal, :date, :datetime, :timestamp, :time], :formatter => Proc.new {|param| Range.new(param.first, param.last)}, :validator => Proc.new {|param| param.is_a?(Array) && !(param[0].blank? || param[1].blank?) }
See MetaSearch::Where for info on the supported options.
MetaSearch can be given access to any class method on your model to extend its search capabilities. The only rule is that the method must return an ActiveRecord::Relation so that MetaSearch can continue to extend the search with other attributes. Conveniently, scopes (formerly “named scopes”) do this already.
Consider the following model:
class Company < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :slackers, :class_name => "Developer", :conditions => {:slacker => true} scope :backwards_name, lambda {|name| where(:name => name.reverse)} scope :with_slackers_by_name_and_salary_range, lambda {|name, low, high| joins(:slackers).where(:developers => {:name => name, :salary => low..high}) } end
To allow MetaSearch access to a model method, including a named scope, just use search_methods in the model:
search_methods :backwards_name
This will allow you to add a text field named :backwards_name to your search form, and it will behave as you might expect.
In the case of the second scope, we have multiple parameters to pass in, of different types. We can pass the following to search_methods:
search_methods :with_slackers_by_name_and_salary_range, :splat_param => true, :type => [:string, :integer, :integer]
MetaSearch needs us to tell it that we don’t want to keep the array supplied to it as-is, but “splat” it when passing it to the model method. Regarding :types: In this case, ActiveRecord would have been smart enough to handle the typecasting for us, but I wanted to demonstrate how we can tell MetaSearch that a given parameter is of a specific database “column type.” This is just a hint MetaSearch uses in the same way it does when casting “Where” params based on the DB column being searched. It’s also important so that things like dates get handled properly by FormBuilder.
The example Where above adds support for a “between” search, which requires an array with two parameters. These can be passed using Rails multiparameter attributes. To make life easier, MetaSearch adds a helper for this:
<%= f.multiparameter_field :moderations_value_between,
{:field_type => :text_field}, {:field_type => :text_field}, :size => 5 %>
multiparameter_field works pretty much like the other FormBuilder helpers, but it lets you sandwich a list of fields, each in hash format, between the attribute and the usual options hash. See MetaSearch::Helpers::FormBuilder for more info.
If you need to get an array into your where, and you don’t care about parameter order, you might choose to use a select or collection_select with multiple selection enabled, but everyone hates multiple selection boxes. MetaSearch adds a couple of additional helpers, checks and collection_checks to handle multiple selections in a more visually appealing manner. They can be called with or without a block. Without a block, you get an array of MetaSearch::Check objects to do with as you please.
With a block, each check is yielded to your template, like so:
<h4>How many heads?</h4>
<ul>
<% f.checks :number_of_heads_in,
[['One', 1], ['Two', 2], ['Three', 3]], :class => 'checkboxy' do |check| %>
<li>
<%= check.box %>
<%= check.label %>
</li>
<% end %>
</ul>
Again, full documentation is in MetaSearch::Helpers::FormBuilder.
If you’d like to sort by a specific column in your results (the attributes of the base model) or an association column then supply the meta_sort parameter in your form. The parameter takes the form column.direction where column is the column name or underscore-separated association_column combination, and direction is one of “asc” or “desc” for ascending or descending, respectively.
Normally, you won’t supply this parameter yourself, but instead will use the helper method sort_link in your views, like so:
<%= sort_link @search, :title %>
Or, if in the context of a form_for against a MetaSearch::Builder:
<%= f.sort_link :title %>
The @search object is the instance of MetaSearch::Builder you got back earlier from your controller. The other required parameter is the attribute name itself. Optionally, you can provide a string as a 3rd parameter to override the default link name, and then additional hashed for the options and html_options hashes for link_to.
By default, the link that is created will sort by the given column in ascending order when first clicked. If you’d like to reverse this (so the first click sorts the results in descending order), you can pass +:default_order => :desc+ in the options hash, like so:
<%= sort_link @search, :ratings, "Highest Rated", :default_order => :desc %>
You can sort by more than one column as well, by creating a link like:
<%= sort_link :name_and_salary %>
If you’d like to do a custom sort, you can do so by setting up two scopes in your model:
scope :sort_by_custom_name_asc, order('custom_name ASC') scope :sort_by_custom_name_desc, order('custom_name DESC')
You can then do sort_link @search, :custom_name and it will work as you expect.
All sort_link-generated links will have the CSS class sort_link, as well as a directional class (ascending or descending) if the link is for a currently sorted column, for your styling enjoyment.
This feature should hopefully help out those of you migrating from Searchlogic, and a thanks goes out to Ben Johnson for the HTML entities used for the up and down arrows, which provide a nice default look.
If you’d like to allow only certain associations or attributes to be searched, you can do so inside your models
class Article < ActiveRecord::Base attr_searchable :some_public_data, :some_more_searchable_stuff assoc_searchable :search_this_association_why_dontcha end
If you’d rather blacklist attributes and associations rather than whitelist, use the attr_unsearchable and assoc_unsearchable method instead. If a whitelist is supplied, it takes precedence.
Excluded attributes on a model will be honored across associations, so if an Article has_many :comments and the Comment model looks something like this:
class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :user_id, :body attr_unsearchable :user_id end
Then your call to Article.search will allow :comments_body_contains but not :comments_user_id_equals to be passed.
search_methods, attr_searchable, attr_unsearchable, assoc_searchable, and assoc_unsearchable all accept an :if option. If present, it should specify a Proc (or other object responding to call) that accepts a single parameter. This parameter will be the instance of the MetaSearch::Builder that gets created by a call to Model.search. Any unused search options (the second hash param) that get passed to Model.search will be available via the Builder object’s options reader, and can be used for access control via this proc/object.
Example:
assoc_unsearchable :notes, :if => proc {|s| s.options[:access] == 'blocked' || !s.options[:access]}
MetaSearch supports i18n localization in a few different ways. Consider this abbreviated example “flanders” locale:
flanders:
activerecord:
attributes:
company:
name: "Company name-diddly"
developer:
name: "Developer name-diddly"
salary: "Developer salary-doodly"
meta_search:
or: 'or-diddly'
predicates:
contains: "%{attribute} contains-diddly"
equals: "%{attribute} equals-diddly"
attributes:
company:
reverse_name: "Company reverse name-diddly"
developer:
name_contains: "Developer name-diddly contains-aroonie"
First, MetaSearch will use a key found under meta_search.attributes.model_name.attribute_name, if it exists. As a fallback, it will use a localization based on the predicate type, along with the usual ActiveRecord attribute localization (the activerecord.attributes.model_name keys above). Additionally, a localized “or” can be specified for multi-column searches.
There are several ways you can help MetaSearch continue to improve.
-
Use MetaSearch in your real-world projects and submit bug reports or feature suggestions.
-
Better yet, if you’re so inclined, fix the issue yourself and submit a patch! Or you can fork the project on GitHub and send me a pull request (please include tests!)
-
If you like MetaSearch, spread the word. More users == more eyes on code == more bugs getting found == more bugs getting fixed (hopefully!)
-
Lastly, if MetaSearch has saved you hours of development time on your latest Rails gig, and you’re feeling magnanimous, please consider making a donation to the project. I have spent hours of my personal time coding and supporting MetaSearch, and your donation would go a great way toward justifying that time spent to my loving wife. :)
Copyright © 2010 Ernie Miller. See LICENSE for details.