Try to fix retrieval of the configuration schemas from the actors.

Depends-On: 870

commands/upgrade/__init__.py

@@ -94,7 +94,8 @@ def upgrade(args, breadcrumbs):
 
     # Read the Actor Config and validate it against the schemas saved in the
     # configuration.
-    actor_config_schemas = repositories.get_config_schemas()
+    actor_config_schemas = tuple(actor.config_schemas for actor in repositories.actors)
+    actor_config_schemas = actor_config.normalize_schemas(actor_config_schemas)
     actor_config_path = cfg.get('actor_config', 'path')
     # Note: actor_config.load() stores the loaded actor config into a global
     # variable which can then be accessed by functions in that file.  Is this

repos/system_upgrade/common/configs/rpm.py

@@ -6,10 +6,14 @@
 from leapp.actors.configs import Config
 
 
-### Nested containers?
-### Duplication of default value in type_ and Config.  If we eliminate that, we need to extract default from the type_ for the documentation.
-### We probably want to allow dicts in Config.  But IIRC, dicts were specifically excluded for model fields.  Do we need something that restricts where fields are valid?
-### Test that type validation is strict.  For instance, giving an integer like 644 to a field.String() is an error.
+# * Nested containers?
+# * Duplication of default value in type_ and Config.  If we eliminate that, we need to extract
+# default from the type_ for the documentation.
+# * We probably want to allow dicts in Config.  But IIRC, dicts were
+# specifically excluded for model fields.  Do we need something that restricts
+# where fields are valid?
+# * Test that type validation is strict.  For instance, giving an integer like 644 to
+# a field.String() is an error.
 class Transaction_ToInstall(Config):
     section = "transaction"
     name = "to_install"