Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(#77): Add compile goal to benchmark integration test #79

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jan 15, 2024

Conversation

volodya-lombrozo
Copy link
Member

@volodya-lombrozo volodya-lombrozo commented Jan 15, 2024

Now we can compile high-level eo representation to low-level eo representation. But we can compile only the small number of constructs and probably with some errors.
I added a few puzzles to verify the compilation process.

Closes: #77.


History:


PR-Codex overview

Detailed summary

  • Added a new execution in pom.xml with the goal compile.
  • Updated the minimum values for INSTRUCTION, LINE, BRANCH, and COMPLEXITY in pom.xml.
  • Implemented the opcodes() method in the Mul, StoreLocal, WriteField, Invocation, and Constructor classes.
  • Added imports for Constructor, Invocation, StoreLocal, and WriteField in OpeoNodes.java.

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

@volodya-lombrozo
Copy link
Member Author

@rultor merge

@rultor
Copy link
Contributor

rultor commented Jan 15, 2024

@rultor merge

@volodya-lombrozo OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

@rultor rultor merged commit 7732f98 into objectionary:master Jan 15, 2024
8 checks passed
@rultor
Copy link
Contributor

rultor commented Jan 15, 2024

@rultor merge

@volodya-lombrozo Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 19min)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

OpeoNodes.java:108-112: Add more nodes to the parser....
3 participants