Fixing all ORCIDs to use https which is the correct form for unification. #9645
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
pnrobinson
approved these changes
Mar 3, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems fine although I should say that if we just stored the 16-digit number, there would be fewer chances to mess things up! I will merge though and maybe we should add a Q/C check for this? @matentzn
|
I would like to deal with #8032 if you permit me. It will make a very nice section in the upcoming paper, and also make me personally very happy. |
|
Can I help with this? It would be cool to be a co-author of a publication that I could point to for my work on the ORCID instance ontology |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related: information-artifact-ontology/ontology-metadata#60