Skip to content

dev meeting 2024 01 24

Marek Kubica edited this page Jan 26, 2024 · 3 revisions

Present: @rgrinberg @Leonidas-from-XIV @moyodiallo @ElectreAAS Maxim Grankin, @bn-d

  • Changes to install in 3.11, Maxim

    • In 3.11 we deprecated installing to parent directories (../)
    • How long will the functionality be still available? Until 4.0 at least
    • As an alternative to this, can new sections be added?
      • sections are mostly inherited from OPAM, for compatibility
      • Files can be installed in the prefix root (dune install --prefix=DIR)
      • New sections with a flag as guard welcome to be submitted as PR (issue describing the approach: #9832)
  • Submodule support (@Leonidas-from-XIV)

    • Submitted
    • Missing support for relative file paths, although that is not a common use case (the Git CLI has guards against doing this) and if people need it it can still be added
  • Git support (@rgrinberg)

    • We need to make sure packages that have Git sources use the Rev Store
    • @Leonidas-from-XIV to check that this is happening
  • Missing items for the MVP (@Leonidas-from-XIV)

    • Pinning
    • Relocatable ocamlfind (@emillon would know about the progress on this)
    • Performance improvements
    • We are in good shape!
    • @rgrinberg has a list of outstanding issues that can be picked up
  • Opam-repository changes (@Leonidas-from-XIV)

    • @Leonidas-from-XIV attended the meeting about scaling the opam-repo ocaml/opam-repository#23789
    • The proposal with currently the biggest amounts of proponents puts archived packages in a secondary repo
    • No issues for the dune packaging support
  • Duplicate packages in multiple repos (@ElectreAAS)

    • @ElectreAAS wants to fix a part of the packaging code that @Leonidas-from-XIV was concerned about
    • We pass a list of valid package candidates to the solver in the order that the user specified the repositories in
    • The solver would give us a package + version and to determine which repo it was from we would need to search for it
    • This could potentially create issues where the package we find and the package the solver wanted are different if name + version are the same
    • @rgrinberg fixed this by never giving passing the solver the same name + version twice
    • OPAM behavior is identical in this case (verified in a later discussion with @kit-ty-kate)
    • It would be nice to have a test to check this behavior
Clone this wiki locally