-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 475
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Patient categorisation- add definitions #7962
Comments
|
Place patient category below IP no. |
@aparnacoronasafe Having descriptions only when it's ICU patients seems inconsistent. Can you suggest descriptions for non-ICU patients too? Would that be the same or different? |
@aparnacoronasafe The issue is blocked pending your clarification. Please clarify so that this can go into the next release. |
@gigincg I got confirmation that the categorisation holds good for all hospitalised patients. Edited the issue. |
@skks1212 Can you take this forward? |
@aparnacoronasafe thanks for the clarification, I'll update the PR accordingly |
@gigincg @aparnacoronasafe Had a doubt, As per issue, we are going to keep all existing data as comfort care itself without migration and hide the comfort care patient category from the frontend from now on. If someone pulls analytics of patient categories for one year after six months from now, won't they see a decline in comfort care patients count and one more that is that they will be seeing data for an option that is no longer available on the frontend. Will this cause a problem for someone who is primarily checking analytics and not interacting directly with the platform alot? CC: @gigincg @skks1212 |
The reason why we need to classify patient as "mild moderate critical" is for the obvious need to understand what degree of care is provided to patients admitted. Having a 4th category for "actively dying" is important to understand the number of patients admitted, where the goal for healthcare providers is not to treat the patient to recovery but to provide the patient care so the patient can have a comfortable death. Having this classification is patients in important to make sense of patient outcomes. Where ever you have higher % of actively dying patients, % of expired in outcome will also be high. Earlier we were using the term "comfort care" for the classification. However using comfort care is not correct here because it is a wider term that may include patients actively dying or other patients that may be suffering from a disease like a viral infection that may not have any active treatment options. Some of such patients may recover. Hence the definition is "comfort care" is too wide. "Actively dying" is defined very specifically as patients that are dying. For analytics we will have 5 categories 2- there is no fine text required for actively dying. The term is self explanatory |
@aparnacoronasafe I had a word with @athulmaunel and he is of the option that the descriptions are quite confusing. Even for me it was super confusing. |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
CARE provides options for users to categorise patients as "Comfort care/ Mild/Moderate/Critical". However, there is no definition for this categorisation and users may use it subjectively.
Providing more definitions would help bring about more standardisation in the way this categorisation is utilised.
Describe the solution you'd like
Mild (Urgent: not life-threatening)
Moderate (Emergency: could be life-threatening)
Critical (Immediate: life-threatening)
Make this fine text visible in the dropdown itself
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: