-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 470
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes timestamp alignment and adds 'Last Modified' section in patient management #9397 #9410
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Fixes timestamp alignment and adds 'Last Modified' section in patient management #9397 #9410
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/components/Facility/ConsultationDetails/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
345-354
: LGTM: Consider extracting timestamp display into a reusable componentThe implementation correctly aligns the "Last Modified" timestamp section. However, there's an opportunity to reduce code duplication by extracting the timestamp display logic into a reusable component.
Consider creating a shared component:
+ const TimestampDisplay = ({ label, date, user, tooltipPosition }) => ( + <div className="flex items-center"> + <span className="text-secondary-900">{label}: </span> + <RelativeDateUserMention + actionDate={date} + user={user} + tooltipPosition={tooltipPosition} + withoutSuffix={true} + /> + </div> + ); // Usage: - <div className="flex items-center"> - <span className="text-secondary-900">Created: </span> - <RelativeDateUserMention - actionDate={consultationData.created_date} - user={consultationData.created_by} - tooltipPosition="right" - withoutSuffix={true} - /> - </div> + <TimestampDisplay + label="Created" + date={consultationData.created_date} + user={consultationData.created_by} + tooltipPosition="right" + />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/Facility/ConsultationDetails/index.tsx
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/Facility/ConsultationDetails/index.tsx (2)
Line range hint 334-341
: LGTM: Improved vertical alignment of timestamp display
The addition of items-center
class properly centers the timestamp and user information vertically within the flex container, improving the visual alignment as intended.
Line range hint 334-354
: Verify responsive behavior at specified breakpoints
The implementation uses Tailwind's md:
prefix for responsive design, but let's verify the behavior specifically at the mentioned breakpoints (768-772px).
✅ Verification successful
Responsive behavior implementation appears correct
The implementation follows Tailwind's standard responsive design practices:
- Uses default Tailwind breakpoints where
md:
applies at ≥768px - The component correctly implements responsive classes for layout changes:
- Flex direction changes from column to row (
flex-col md:flex-row
) - Text alignment adjusts for larger screens (
md:text-right
)
- Flex direction changes from column to row (
- No custom breakpoint overrides are defined in the Tailwind config that would affect the 768-772px range
The responsive behavior should work as expected across the specified breakpoint range (768-772px).
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for responsive classes and breakpoint definitions that might affect the timestamp display
# Look for Tailwind config files that might override default breakpoints
fd -e js -e ts -e json -g "*tailwind*" -x cat {} \; | grep -A 5 "screens"
# Search for responsive classes in the codebase that might affect these components
rg "md:[a-zA-Z0-9:-]+" --type tsx --type jsx -A 2 -B 2
Length of output: 161
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the Tailwind configuration and responsive classes
# Search for Tailwind config files
find . -type f -name "tailwind.config.*"
# Search for responsive classes using ripgrep with correct file extensions
rg "md:[a-zA-Z0-9:-]+" --type ts --type jsx --type js -A 2 -B 2
# Look for any screen/breakpoint configurations in package.json or other config files
find . -type f -name "package.json" -o -name "*.config.*" | xargs cat | grep -A 5 "screens\|breakpoints"
Length of output: 1020
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the Tailwind configuration and the component's responsive classes
# First, let's look at the project's Tailwind configuration
cat ./tailwind.config.js
# Let's search for responsive classes in the specific component file
rg "md:" "src/components/Facility/ConsultationDetails/index.tsx"
# Let's also check for any related components that might affect the responsive behavior
rg -l "RelativeDateUserMention" --type ts
Length of output: 3024
Proposed Changes
@ohcnetwork/care-fe-code-reviewers
Merge Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes