Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/index objects in objectariums #8

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 4, 2023

Conversation

ErikssonJoakim
Copy link
Contributor

This PR implements a first version of the objectarium object indexer

In a second PR we should add a pinned field so we can know who has pinned the object.

@ErikssonJoakim ErikssonJoakim self-assigned this Aug 3, 2023
@ErikssonJoakim ErikssonJoakim marked this pull request as ready for review August 3, 2023 15:41
schema.graphql Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
schema.graphql Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@ccamel ccamel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks 👍

@ErikssonJoakim ErikssonJoakim force-pushed the feat/index-objects-in-objectariums branch from 287c9c1 to d8aa592 Compare August 4, 2023 10:14
@ErikssonJoakim ErikssonJoakim force-pushed the feat/index-objects-in-objectariums branch from d8aa592 to 6adeca7 Compare August 4, 2023 11:18
Copy link
Member

@amimart amimart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems fine! Great :)

@ErikssonJoakim ErikssonJoakim merged commit e803088 into main Aug 4, 2023
9 checks passed
@ErikssonJoakim ErikssonJoakim deleted the feat/index-objects-in-objectariums branch August 4, 2023 15:02
@bot-anik
Copy link
Member

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.0.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants