Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

⬆️ upgrade prettier to v3.5.3 #207

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 9, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
prettier (source) 3.4.2 -> 3.5.3 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

prettier/prettier (prettier)

v3.5.3

Compare Source

v3.5.2

Compare Source

diff

Remove module-sync condition (#​17156 by @​fisker)

In Prettier 3.5.0, we added module-sync condition to package.json, so that require("prettier") can use ESM version, but turns out it doesn't work if CommonJS and ESM plugins both imports builtin plugins. To solve this problem, we decide simply remove the module-sync condition, so require("prettier") will still use the CommonJS version, we'll revisit until require(ESM) feature is more stable.

v3.5.1

Compare Source

diff

Fix CLI crash when cache for old version exists (#​17100 by @​sosukesuzuki)

Prettier 3.5 uses a different cache format than previous versions, Prettier 3.5.0 crashes when reading existing cache file, Prettier 3.5.1 fixed the problem.

Support dockercompose and github-actions-workflow in VSCode (#​17101 by @​remcohaszing)

Prettier now supports the dockercompose and github-actions-workflow languages in Visual Studio Code.

v3.5.0

Compare Source

diff

🔗 Release Notes


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot added the dependencies label Feb 9, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/prettier-3.x-lockfile branch from 4f1753c to 6bc8aff Compare February 9, 2025 13:07
@renovate renovate bot changed the title ⬆️ upgrade prettier to v3.5.0 ⬆️ upgrade prettier to v3.5.1 Feb 13, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/prettier-3.x-lockfile branch 7 times, most recently from 7cdffe9 to 5c0b920 Compare February 16, 2025 01:57
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/prettier-3.x-lockfile branch from 5c0b920 to 2e4f974 Compare February 22, 2025 05:25
@renovate renovate bot changed the title ⬆️ upgrade prettier to v3.5.1 ⬆️ upgrade prettier to v3.5.2 Feb 22, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/prettier-3.x-lockfile branch 4 times, most recently from 82f78e3 to 29c9949 Compare March 1, 2025 05:05
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/prettier-3.x-lockfile branch 10 times, most recently from 869b2c6 to ea9a7b4 Compare March 3, 2025 02:58
@renovate renovate bot changed the title ⬆️ upgrade prettier to v3.5.2 ⬆️ upgrade prettier to v3.5.3 Mar 3, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/prettier-3.x-lockfile branch 3 times, most recently from 460cbe2 to 1552da8 Compare March 8, 2025 13:33
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/prettier-3.x-lockfile branch 3 times, most recently from 464a40e to b6e06fa Compare March 15, 2025 10:45
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/prettier-3.x-lockfile branch 4 times, most recently from b17a84f to 28be1f9 Compare March 22, 2025 15:00
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/prettier-3.x-lockfile branch from 28be1f9 to 6c4ddb0 Compare March 22, 2025 18:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants