-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 179
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Random beacon comments #6590
Random beacon comments #6590
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## feature/efm-recovery #6590 +/- ##
========================================================
- Coverage 41.71% 41.71% -0.01%
========================================================
Files 2030 2030
Lines 180459 180459
========================================================
- Hits 75272 75271 -1
- Misses 98991 98995 +4
+ Partials 6196 6193 -3
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. β View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the detailed revisions. Love it. So much better and more accurate. No objections. My suggestions are essentially only trying to extend your documentation here and there with additional context to explain why things are the way they are on a more intuitive level. Feel free to reject or modify any or all of my suggestions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
π’
Updates to the DKG/Random beacon related docs:
β
(the set of nodes able to participate in the random beacon) is a subset ofπ β© π
.|β|
is in the safe range.