Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Adding OpenFeature provider for Schematic #315

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bpapillon
Copy link

@bpapillon bpapillon commented Feb 11, 2025

This PR

Adding a new project containing an OpenFeature provider implementation for Schematic. This will allow Schematic users to connect their Schematic instance to an OpenFeature client for flag checks and activity tracking.

  • Implements OpenFeature provider for Schematic, supporting boolean feature flags and tracking.

Notes

Setup information is described in the README file.

How to test

The provider can be tested by following the examples in the README. Note that, unless running in offline mode, one will need a Schematic account to issue an API key for testing; this can be acquired by creating an account at https://app.schematichq.com/

@bpapillon bpapillon force-pushed the feature/schematic-provider branch from e7305ac to 66f1bd8 Compare February 11, 2025 16:56
@bpapillon bpapillon marked this pull request as ready for review February 11, 2025 16:57
@bpapillon bpapillon requested review from a team as code owners February 11, 2025 16:57
@bpapillon bpapillon force-pushed the feature/schematic-provider branch from f0026a4 to 5759f18 Compare March 12, 2025 20:10
@bpapillon bpapillon marked this pull request as draft March 12, 2025 20:25
@bpapillon bpapillon force-pushed the feature/schematic-provider branch from 5759f18 to 67d2f76 Compare March 12, 2025 20:32
@bpapillon bpapillon marked this pull request as ready for review March 12, 2025 20:34
@bpapillon bpapillon marked this pull request as draft March 12, 2025 20:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants