-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 841
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Extends TextMapGetter with GetAll() method, implement usage in W3CBaggagePropagator #6852
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Extends TextMapGetter with GetAll() method, implement usage in W3CBaggagePropagator #6852
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6852 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 90.23% 90.22% -0.01%
- Complexity 6594 6603 +9
============================================
Files 729 730 +1
Lines 19800 19822 +22
Branches 1947 1953 +6
============================================
+ Hits 17867 17885 +18
- Misses 1341 1343 +2
- Partials 592 594 +2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
* @return the first value of the given propagation {@code key} as a singleton list, or returns an | ||
* empty list. | ||
*/ | ||
default List<String> getList(@Nullable C carrier, String key) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps using List<String>
isn't the best option. Maybe Iterable<String>
as used in keys
or Iterator<String>
would work better? When using List<String>
and carrier is HttpServletRequest
where getHeaders
returns Enumeration
you'd have to copy the enumeration to list with Collections.list(carrier.getHeaders(key))
. When using Iterator<String>
you could skip copying the enumeration to list with
Enumeration<String> enumeration = carrier.getHeaders(key);
return new Iterator<String>() {
@Override
public boolean hasNext() {
return enumeration.hasMoreElements();
}
@Override
public String next() {
return enumeration.nextElement();
}
};
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes I agree Iterator<String>
is a better choice given the use of Enumeration
in HttpServletRequest
. I had just copied @jack-berg's implementation from #6837. Will update once we get alignment with Jack.
In terms of the name of the new method, getList
also would no longer make sense. Possible names could be getIterator
or getAllValues
, let me know preference.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm... iterator is easier / less allocation for some TextMapGetter
implementations, but (slighty) worse ergonomics for callers.
Given this, I think iterator is the better choice since we expect most (all?) propagator instances to be maintained by opentelemetry, and its fine for us to have slightly more burden to improve performance.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cool, I've changed it to Iterator
. I've also renamed the method to getAll()
* @return the first value of the given propagation {@code key} as a singleton list, or returns an | ||
* empty list. | ||
*/ | ||
default List<String> getList(@Nullable C carrier, String key) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It might be necessary for us to add this in an experimental fashion, rather than jumping straight to the stable API.
For example, we could have an ExtendedTextMapGetter
interface in opentelemetry-api-incubator
or in an internal package of opentelemetry-context
. Then, W3CBaggagePropagator
could check if (getter instanceOf ExtendedTextMapGetter)
and adjust its behavior accordingly.
If we do this, I think it would have to go in opentelemetry-context
instead of opentelemetry-api-incubator
since W3CBaggagePropagator
doesn't have access to opentelemetry-api-incubator
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense to me
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, this is done - please take a look
b3f4af6
to
6f13bfb
Compare
context/src/main/java/io/opentelemetry/context/internal/propagation/ExtendedTextMapGetter.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this looks great.
…using new getList() method on the TextMapGetter. Includes tests.
…etter, as per review. Also changes the return type of the method to Iterator<String> as per review, and renames the method to getAll(). Tests are also adjusted
…context.internal.propagation package into context.propagation.internal package
3cd5429
to
28c8491
Compare
…, it returns an empty iterator. Includes tests to verify the behaviour.
…lid baggage syntax
@jack-berg FYI - just made some slight changes. I realised I needed to check for I've also added tests to verify this behaviour, and a couple more baggage tests (the build was complaining the coverage wasn't quite there, so I covered the remanining lines) |
…ey (#4295) Fixes #433 Discussed in 11/5/24 Spec SIG, and prototyped in Java and Go. ## Changes Adds `GetAll` method to Getter, allowing for the retrieval of multiple keys for the same value. For example, an HTTP request may have multiple `baggage` headers. As written in the changes, the implementation of `GetAll` is strictly optional. This is for two reasons: 1. Backwards compatibility with existing types/interfaces 2. Carriers do not necessarily support returning multiple values for a single key ## Links to Prototypes This includes implementations of `GetAll()` in Java and Go, as well as using the method in the W3C Baggage Propagators (multiple baggage headers are allowed, [spec reference](https://www.w3.org/TR/baggage/#baggage-http-header-format)). - Java: open-telemetry/opentelemetry-java#6852 - Go: open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go#5973 * [x] Links to the prototypes (when adding or changing features) * [x] [`CHANGELOG.md`](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) file updated for non-trivial changes --------- Co-authored-by: Trask Stalnaker <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: jack-berg <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Robert Pająk <[email protected]>
Implements proposed spec changes in open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#433 and #6837
getList()
method toTextMapGetter
, with default methodW3CBaggagePropagator
to handle multiple headers for baggage, using newgetList()
method.The vast majority of HTTP server implementation are able to return multiple header values, including the commonly used
HttpServletRequest
. I have published this branch to my local maven and demonstrated it's usage in the Spring Web MVC instrumentation module, which uses theHttpServletRequest
interface. See here: open-telemetry/opentelemetry-java-instrumentation#12581