Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Map qualified_relations onto dataset #83

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 10, 2023

Conversation

bellisk
Copy link
Contributor

@bellisk bellisk commented Oct 2, 2023

No description provided.

@bellisk bellisk marked this pull request as ready for review October 4, 2023 07:36
@@ -717,6 +733,32 @@ def graph_from_dataset(self, dataset_dict, dataset_ref): # noqa
Literal(reference_identifier)
))

if dataset_dict.get("qualified_relations"):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Short question: What is best practice in python: single or double question marks? Could we add this for linting?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There isn't a single accepted practise (although we should be consistent, which I realise this is not). When we upgrade to Python 3, we can start using Black for linting, which requires double quotes.

@bellisk bellisk merged commit 8b4ca15 into master Oct 10, 2023
4 checks passed
@bellisk bellisk deleted the feat/harvest-dataset-qualified-relation branch October 10, 2023 09:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants