Fix some trusty issues

[andrewballantyne]

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-15008

Description

Fixes an incorrect type of required requestName and defaults to a generated one if it's missing.

How Has This Been Tested?

• Create a Trusty Service against a DB (using the Mariadb steps)
• Create a Trusty metric via the CLI with the specific fail points (see RHOAIENG-15008 ticket for details)
• UI now renders it with a generated name

Test Impact

None, bad type -- everything should be working as intended.

Request review criteria:

Self checklist (all need to be checked):

• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has added tests or explained why testing cannot be added (unit or cypress tests for related changes)

If you have UI changes:

• Included any necessary screenshots or gifs if it was a UI change.
• Included tags to the UX team if it was a UI/UX change.

After the PR is posted & before it merges:

• The developer has tested their solution on a cluster by using the image produced by the PR to main

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.95%. Comparing base (7068314) to head (a7fb768).
Report is 27 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3371      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.91%   85.95%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files        1338     1339       +1     
  Lines       30283    30342      +59     
  Branches     8356     8384      +28     
==========================================
+ Hits        26018    26079      +61     
+ Misses       4265     4263       -2     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
frontend/src/api/trustyai/rawTypes.ts	100.00% <ø> (ø)
frontend/src/concepts/trustyai/utils.ts	63.88% <100.00%> (+1.03%)	⬆️

... and 32 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3db54bd...a7fb768. Read the comment docs.

[andrewballantyne]

/retest

[andrewballantyne]

/retest

[Gkrumbach07]

I am going to put a lgtm bc the code looks good. I tried to test it but i could not find the test model they were using and kept getting this back when trying to create the metric from the cli

{"title":"Constraint Violation","status":400,"violations":[{"field":"createRequest.request.mnist.onnx","message":"No metadata found for model=mnist.onnx. This can happen if TrustyAI has not yet logged any inferences from this model."},{"field":"createRequest.request","message":"The supplied metric request details are not valid."}]}%       

/lgtm

[Gkrumbach07]

/lgtm

tested before and after change and error is gone

before:

after:

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Gkrumbach07

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• frontend/OWNERS [Gkrumbach07]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment