Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

solve cicd issue #266

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

houwenchen
Copy link
Contributor

Pull Request template

Please, go through these steps before you submit a PR.

Why is this PR required? What issue does it fix?:

What this PR does?:

Does this PR require any upgrade changes?:

If the changes in this PR are manually verified, list down the scenarios covered::

Any additional information for your reviewer? :
Mention if this PR is part of any design or a continuation of previous PRs

Checklist:

  • Fixes #
  • PR Title follows the convention of <type>(<scope>): <subject>
  • Has the change log section been updated?
  • Commit has unit tests
  • Commit has integration tests
  • (Optional) Are upgrade changes included in this PR? If not, mention the issue/PR to track:
  • (Optional) If documentation changes are required, which issue on https://github.com/openebs/openebs-docs is used to track them:

PLEASE REMOVE BELOW INFORMATION BEFORE SUBMITTING

The PR title message must follow convention:
<type>(<scope>): <subject>.

Where:

  • type is defining if release will be triggering after merging submitted changes, details in CONTRIBUTING.md.
    Most common types are:

    • feat - for new features, not a new feature for build script
    • fix - for bug fixes or improvements, not a fix for build script
    • chore - changes not related to production code
    • docs - changes related to documentation
    • style - formatting, missing semi colons, linting fix etc; no significant production code changes
    • test - adding missing tests, refactoring tests; no production code change
    • refactor - refactoring production code, eg. renaming a variable or function name, there should not be any significant production code changes
  • scope is a single word that best describes where the changes fit.
    Most common scopes are like:

    • data engine (localpv, jiva, cstor)
    • feature (provisioning, backup, restore, exporter)
    • code component (api, webhook, cast, upgrade)
    • test (tests, bdd)
    • chores (version, build, log, travis)
  • subject is a single line brief description of the changes made in the pull request.

Signed-off-by: houwenchen <[email protected]>
@houwenchen houwenchen mentioned this pull request Oct 19, 2023
@abhilashshetty04 abhilashshetty04 changed the title slove cicd issue solve cicd issue Oct 25, 2023
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (develop@9e0ac5b). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             develop    #266   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage           ?   2.80%           
=========================================
  Files              ?      61           
  Lines              ?    4107           
  Branches           ?       0           
=========================================
  Hits               ?     115           
  Misses             ?    3983           
  Partials           ?       9           

Copy link
Member

@niladrih niladrih left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left a comment

uses: codecov/codecov-action@v1
uses: codecov/codecov-action@v3
with:
token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This token does not exist for this repo. Is this required?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, should add a codecov token in this project.

@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ format:
.PHONY: test
test: format
@echo "--> Running go test" ;
@go test $(UNIT_TEST_PACKAGES)
@go test $(UNIT_TEST_PACKAGES) -cover -coverpkg=./... -covermode=atomic -coverprofile=coverage.txt
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is already present in /buildscripts/test-cov.sh

@niladrih
Copy link
Member

niladrih commented Nov 1, 2023

I think this change should use the script /buildscripts/test-cov.sh in the 'test' Makefile target, and then try to publish the codecov result without a token? Token is usually required when there are chances of a large number of github api calls, I think.

@houwenchen houwenchen closed this Nov 1, 2023
@houwenchen houwenchen reopened this Nov 1, 2023
@houwenchen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@niladrih , it's just like docker token to upload docker image.

Copy link
Member

@niladrih niladrih left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@houwenchen -- these changes also need to go into pull_request.yml

@Abhinandan-Purkait
Copy link
Member

Has been cherry-picked.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants