-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 173
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: update Django to 4.2.16 for Redwood - Security Patch #4440
chore: update Django to 4.2.16 for Redwood - Security Patch #4440
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, @magajh! What's next?Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review: 🔘 Get product approvalIf you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.
🔘 Provide contextTo help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:
🔘 Get a green buildIf one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green. 🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:Who will review my changes?This repository is currently maintained by Where can I find more information?If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:
When can I expect my changes to be merged?Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible. However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:
💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR. |
8314c1f
to
21635a2
Compare
@magajh I've tested the build via tutor build. |
I believe we can igrone the python3.8 fails due to #4439 |
21635a2
to
6221ab4
Compare
@feanil Could you please remind me of the python version support for Redwood. I believe we do not support python3.8 on Redwood. |
8c80b5a
to
6221ab4
Compare
@cmltaWt0 not really sure why this is failing now, but it seems to be an issue with the packaging library version in The good news is that according to this comment we can safely ignore the python3.8 failures: #4450 (comment) 🥇 |
@feanil Could you please remind me of the python version support for Redwood. I believe we do not support python3.8 on Redwood.
Ohh, I didn't see that comment. So it's really looks like we can ignore the python3.8 support 👍 |
@feanil Could you please remind me of the python version support for Redwood. I believe we do not support python3.8 on Redwood. UPD:
Ohh, I didn't see that comment. So it's really looks like we can ignore the python3.8 support 👍 |
3bfd29a
into
openedx:open-release/redwood.master
See: openedx/wg-build-test-release#386