-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: upgrading list_instructor_tasks to DRF ( 10th ) #35332
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
036ae63
feat: upgrading simple api to drf compatible.
awais786 a939e58
feat: upgrading simple api to drf compatible.
awais786 1b4712d
feat: upgrading simple api to drf compatible.
awais786 55dd99f
feat: upgrading simple api to drf compatible.
awais786 89741fc
feat: upgrading simple api to drf compatible.
awais786 0c17464
Merge branch 'master' into list_instructor_tasks-api
awais786 4003424
feat: upgrading simple api to drf compatible.
awais786 637599c
feat: upgrading simple api to drf compatible.
awais786 eaafd16
feat: upgrading simple api to drf compatible.
awais786 5f4307e
feat: upgrading simple api to drf compatible.
awais786 51800f7
feat: upgrading simple api to drf compatible.
awais786 d117849
Merge branch 'master' into list_instructor_tasks-api
awais786 ae2a768
feat!: upgrading simple api with DRF.
awais786 5be8671
feat!: updating tests.
awais786 b28f5c6
Merge branch 'master' into list_instructor_tasks-api
awais786 4ddffd9
Merge branch 'master' into list_instructor_tasks-api
awais786 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like this API was previously a POST method but with query string input params, Can we just update the instructor dash to call this as a
GET
method instead since it doesn't actually modify any data?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They are not sending any data. Its a just a post call without any payload. I just maintained the behaviour. May be some other front-end is using it this way ?
Also another similar api exists with
GET
and its hitting same method for getting data. But its different version.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting, okay seems like we have some redundancy that we should cleanup but that can be part of some future work. I don't want to blow up the scope of this change.