feat: [FC-0070] implement move xblock modal #1422

ihor-romaniuk · 2024-10-22T10:56:41Z

🚨 Dependencies:

🔗 frontend-app-authoring [MERGED]
🔗 edx-platform [MERGED]

Settings

EDX_PLATFORM_REPOSITORY: https://github.com/raccoongang/edx-platform.git
EDX_PLATFORM_VERSION: romaniuk/implement-move-xblock-modal

TUTOR_GROVE_NEW_MFES:
  authoring:
    port: 18000
    repository: https://github.com/raccoongang/frontend-app-course-authoring.git
    version: romaniuk/implement-move-xblock-modal

TUTOR_GROVE_WAFFLE_FLAGS:
  - name: contentstore.new_studio_mfe.use_new_unit_page
    everyone: true

TUTOR_GROVE_MFE_LMS_COMMON_SETTINGS:
  MFE_CONFIG:
    ENABLE_UNIT_PAGE: true

Description

This PR introduces the ability to move an xBlock from one unit to another within a course using a modal window. The feature enables users to select a target unit for the xBlock and confirm the move.

move-xblock.mov

Related Pull Requests

feat: [FC-0070] add message events to the unit page container edx-platform#35693 - events and listeners to trigger xBlock move

Testing instructions

сreate a new course.
create several units.
open the course unit page.
add some xBlocks to the unit.
move xBlock to another unit: click three dots icon (xBlock action menu) -> select "Move" -> select new location.

openedx-webhooks · 2024-10-22T10:56:46Z

Thanks for the pull request, @ihor-romaniuk!

What's next?

Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review:

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
- This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

Dependencies

This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...
Blockers

This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.
Timeline information

This PR must be merged by XX date because ...
Partner information

This is for a course on edx.org.
Supporting documentation
Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:

Who will review my changes?

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/2u-tnl. Tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for review.

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
The need for product review
Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

src/course-unit/data/thunk.js

open-craft-grove · 2024-11-08T20:04:45Z

Sandbox deployment successful 🚀
🎓 LMS
📝 Studio
ℹ️ Grove Config, Tutor Config, Tutor Requirements

PKulkoRaccoonGang

[inform]: Regarding the failing tests. Apparently after merging one of the last PRs we had problems with tests for the library functionality. I have already fixed this in a new PR
#1493

PKulkoRaccoonGang · 2024-11-11T06:35:39Z

src/course-unit/CourseUnit.test.jsx

+      )).toBeInTheDocument();
+
+      const currentSection = courseOutlineInfoMock.child_info.children[1];
+      const currentSectionItemText = getByRole('button', {


[optional]: We are looking for a button here, aren't we? Let's call this variable currentSectionItemBtn

Suggested change

const currentSectionItemText = getByRole('button', {

const currentSectionItemBtn = getByRole('button', {

PKulkoRaccoonGang · 2024-11-11T06:44:38Z

src/course-unit/CourseUnit.test.jsx

+        name: `${currentSection.display_name} ${moveModalMessages.moveModalOutlineItemCurrentLocationText.defaultMessage} ${moveModalMessages.moveModalOutlineItemViewText.defaultMessage}`,
+      });
+      expect(currentSectionItemText).toBeInTheDocument();
+      fireEvent.click(currentSectionItemText);


[optional]: I see that in this file there are tests using fireEvent, but let's use a more correct approach with userEvent

https://blog.mimacom.com/react-testing-library-fireevent-vs-userevent/

PKulkoRaccoonGang · 2024-11-11T06:44:58Z

src/course-unit/CourseUnit.test.jsx

+      fireEvent.click(currentSectionItemText);
+
+      const currentSubsection = currentSection.child_info.children[0];
+      const currentSubsectionText = getByRole('button', {


Suggested change

const currentSubsectionText = getByRole('button', {

const currentSectionItemBtn = getByRole('button', {

PKulkoRaccoonGang · 2024-11-11T06:47:56Z

src/course-unit/move-modal/index.tsx

+      <span
+        className="category-text"
+        aria-hidden="true"
+        data-testId="move-xblock-modal-category"


[nit]: data-testid instead of data-testId

Suggested change

data-testId="move-xblock-modal-category"

data-testid="move-xblock-modal-category"

PKulkoRaccoonGang · 2024-11-11T06:56:07Z

src/course-unit/CourseUnit.test.jsx

+      await waitFor(() => {
+        expect(getByText(unitDisplayName)).toBeInTheDocument();
+      });
+
+      axiosMock
+        .onGet(getOutlineInfo(courseId))
+        .reply(200, courseOutlineInfoMock);
+      await executeThunk(getCourseOutlineInfoQuery(courseId), store.dispatch);
+
+      window.dispatchEvent(messageEvent);


[optional]: Since we have an asynchronous state update in this section of code, we will most likely get a warning in the test related to wrapping such sections of code in act(). Let's wrap the blocks that asynchronously update states in this test and the following ones in this PR.

Something like this:

Suggested change

await waitFor(() => {

expect(getByText(unitDisplayName)).toBeInTheDocument();

});

axiosMock

.onGet(getOutlineInfo(courseId))

.reply(200, courseOutlineInfoMock);

await executeThunk(getCourseOutlineInfoQuery(courseId), store.dispatch);

window.dispatchEvent(messageEvent);

await act(async () => {

await waitFor(() => {

expect(getByText(unitDisplayName)).toBeInTheDocument();

});

axiosMock.onGet(getOutlineInfo(courseId)).reply(200, courseOutlineInfoMock);

await executeThunk(getCourseOutlineInfoQuery(courseId), store.dispatch);

window.dispatchEvent(messageEvent);

});

PKulkoRaccoonGang · 2024-11-11T07:59:32Z

src/course-unit/move-modal/moveModal.test.tsx

+    await waitFor(() => userEvent.click(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(sections[1].display_name, 'i') })));
+    await waitFor(() => userEvent.click(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(subsections[1].display_name, 'i') })));
+    await waitFor(() => userEvent.click(within(breadcrumbs).getByText(sections[1].display_name)));


Suggested change

await waitFor(() => userEvent.click(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(sections[1].display_name, 'i') })));

await waitFor(() => userEvent.click(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(subsections[1].display_name, 'i') })));

await waitFor(() => userEvent.click(within(breadcrumbs).getByText(sections[1].display_name)));

await waitFor(() => {

userEvent.click(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(sections[1].display_name, 'i') }));

userEvent.click(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(subsections[1].display_name, 'i') }));

userEvent.click(within(breadcrumbs).getByText(sections[1].display_name));

});

PKulkoRaccoonGang · 2024-11-11T08:03:55Z

src/course-unit/move-modal/moveModal.test.tsx

+  it('correctly navigates through the structure list', async () => {
+    const { getByText, getByRole, getByTestId } = renderComponent();
+    const breadcrumbs: HTMLElement = getByTestId('move-xblock-modal-breadcrumbs');
+    const categoryIndicator: HTMLElement = getByTestId('move-xblock-modal-category');
+
+    expect(within(breadcrumbs).getByText(messages.moveModalBreadcrumbsBaseCategory.defaultMessage)).toBeInTheDocument();
+    expect(
+      within(categoryIndicator).getByText(messages.moveModalBreadcrumbsSections.defaultMessage),
+    ).toBeInTheDocument();
+    sections.map((section) => (
+      expect(getByText(section.display_name)).toBeInTheDocument()
+    ));
+
+    await waitFor(() => userEvent.click(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(sections[1].display_name, 'i') })));
+    await waitFor(() => {
+      expect(
+        within(categoryIndicator).getByText(messages.moveModalBreadcrumbsSubsections.defaultMessage),
+      ).toBeInTheDocument();
+      expect(within(breadcrumbs).getByText(sections[1].display_name)).toBeInTheDocument();
+      subsections.map((subsection) => (
+        expect(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(subsection.display_name, 'i') })).toBeInTheDocument()
+      ));
+    });
+
+    await waitFor(() => userEvent.click(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(subsections[1].display_name, 'i') })));
+    await waitFor(() => {
+      expect(
+        within(categoryIndicator).getByText(messages.moveModalBreadcrumbsUnits.defaultMessage),
+      ).toBeInTheDocument();
+      expect(within(breadcrumbs).getByText(subsections[1].display_name)).toBeInTheDocument();
+      units.map((unit) => (
+        expect(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(unit.display_name, 'i') })).toBeInTheDocument()
+      ));
+    });
+
+    await waitFor(() => userEvent.click(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(units[0].display_name, 'i') })));
+    await waitFor(() => {
+      expect(
+        within(categoryIndicator).getByText(messages.moveModalBreadcrumbsComponents.defaultMessage),
+      ).toBeInTheDocument();
+      expect(within(breadcrumbs).getByText(units[0].display_name)).toBeInTheDocument();
+      components.forEach((component) => {
+        if (component.display_name) {
+          expect(getByText(component.display_name)).toBeInTheDocument();
+        }
+      });
+    });
+  });


[optional]: I tried locally to remove some waitFor and unnecessary types and it works. Please check if you need to use waitFor so often in other tests in this file.

Suggested change

it('correctly navigates through the structure list', async () => {

const { getByText, getByRole, getByTestId } = renderComponent();

const breadcrumbs: HTMLElement = getByTestId('move-xblock-modal-breadcrumbs');

const categoryIndicator: HTMLElement = getByTestId('move-xblock-modal-category');

expect(within(breadcrumbs).getByText(messages.moveModalBreadcrumbsBaseCategory.defaultMessage)).toBeInTheDocument();

expect(

within(categoryIndicator).getByText(messages.moveModalBreadcrumbsSections.defaultMessage),

).toBeInTheDocument();

sections.map((section) => (

expect(getByText(section.display_name)).toBeInTheDocument()

));

await waitFor(() => userEvent.click(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(sections[1].display_name, 'i') })));

await waitFor(() => {

expect(

within(categoryIndicator).getByText(messages.moveModalBreadcrumbsSubsections.defaultMessage),

).toBeInTheDocument();

expect(within(breadcrumbs).getByText(sections[1].display_name)).toBeInTheDocument();

subsections.map((subsection) => (

expect(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(subsection.display_name, 'i') })).toBeInTheDocument()

));

});

await waitFor(() => userEvent.click(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(subsections[1].display_name, 'i') })));

await waitFor(() => {

expect(

within(categoryIndicator).getByText(messages.moveModalBreadcrumbsUnits.defaultMessage),

).toBeInTheDocument();

expect(within(breadcrumbs).getByText(subsections[1].display_name)).toBeInTheDocument();

units.map((unit) => (

expect(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(unit.display_name, 'i') })).toBeInTheDocument()

));

});

await waitFor(() => userEvent.click(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(units[0].display_name, 'i') })));

await waitFor(() => {

expect(

within(categoryIndicator).getByText(messages.moveModalBreadcrumbsComponents.defaultMessage),

).toBeInTheDocument();

expect(within(breadcrumbs).getByText(units[0].display_name)).toBeInTheDocument();

components.forEach((component) => {

if (component.display_name) {

expect(getByText(component.display_name)).toBeInTheDocument();

}

});

});

});

it('correctly navigates through the structure list', async () => {

const { getByText, getByRole, getByTestId } = renderComponent();

const breadcrumbs = getByTestId('move-xblock-modal-breadcrumbs');

const categoryIndicator = getByTestId('move-xblock-modal-category');

expect(within(breadcrumbs).getByText(messages.moveModalBreadcrumbsBaseCategory.defaultMessage)).toBeInTheDocument();

expect(

within(categoryIndicator).getByText(messages.moveModalBreadcrumbsSections.defaultMessage)

).toBeInTheDocument();

sections.forEach((section) => {

expect(getByText(section.display_name)).toBeInTheDocument();

});

userEvent.click(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(sections[1].display_name, 'i') }));

await waitFor(() => {

expect(

within(categoryIndicator).getByText(messages.moveModalBreadcrumbsSubsections.defaultMessage)

).toBeInTheDocument();

expect(within(breadcrumbs).getByText(sections[1].display_name)).toBeInTheDocument();

subsections.forEach((subsection) => {

expect(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(subsection.display_name, 'i') })).toBeInTheDocument();

});

});

userEvent.click(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(subsections[1].display_name, 'i') }));

await waitFor(() => {

expect(

within(categoryIndicator).getByText(messages.moveModalBreadcrumbsUnits.defaultMessage)

).toBeInTheDocument();

expect(within(breadcrumbs).getByText(subsections[1].display_name)).toBeInTheDocument();

units.forEach((unit) => {

expect(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(unit.display_name, 'i') })).toBeInTheDocument();

});

});

userEvent.click(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(units[0].display_name, 'i') }));

await waitFor(() => {

expect(

within(categoryIndicator).getByText(messages.moveModalBreadcrumbsComponents.defaultMessage)

).toBeInTheDocument();

expect(within(breadcrumbs).getByText(units[0].display_name)).toBeInTheDocument();

components.forEach((component) => {

if (component.display_name) {

expect(getByText(component.display_name)).toBeInTheDocument();

}

});

});

});

PKulkoRaccoonGang · 2024-11-11T08:05:19Z

src/course-unit/move-modal/moveModal.test.tsx

+    await waitFor(() => userEvent.click(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(sections[1].display_name, 'i') })));
+    await waitFor(() => userEvent.click(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(subsections[1].display_name, 'i') })));
+    await waitFor(() => userEvent.click(getByRole('button', { name: new RegExp(units[7].display_name, 'i') })));


[optional]: It seems to me that a wrapper of one waitFor will work the same as 3.

PKulkoRaccoonGang · 2024-11-11T08:06:50Z

src/course-unit/move-modal/moveModal.test.tsx

+import MoveModal from './index';
+import messages from './messages';
+
+interface CourseOutlineChildInfo {


[question]: Just a clarification, can we use these TS types inside the component or maybe we are already using them?

Reused from the component

PKulkoRaccoonGang · 2024-11-11T08:11:27Z

src/course-unit/move-modal/utils.ts

+export const getXBlockType = (category: string): string => {
+  switch (true) {
+    case category === CATEGORIES_KEYS.chapter:
+      return CATEGORIES_KEYS.section;
+    case category === CATEGORIES_KEYS.sequential:
+      return CATEGORIES_KEYS.subsection;
+    case category === CATEGORIES_KEYS.vertical:
+      return CATEGORIES_KEYS.unit;
+    default:
+      return category;
+  }
+};


[optional]: I consider switch(true) an anti-pattern if you also suggest using the concatenated approach :)

Suggested change

export const getXBlockType = (category: string): string => {

switch (true) {

case category === CATEGORIES_KEYS.chapter:

return CATEGORIES_KEYS.section;

case category === CATEGORIES_KEYS.sequential:

return CATEGORIES_KEYS.subsection;

case category === CATEGORIES_KEYS.vertical:

return CATEGORIES_KEYS.unit;

default:

return category;

}

};

export const getXBlockType = (category: string): string => {

const categoryMap: { [key: string]: string } = {

[CATEGORIES_KEYS.chapter]: CATEGORIES_KEYS.section,

[CATEGORIES_KEYS.sequential]: CATEGORIES_KEYS.subsection,

[CATEGORIES_KEYS.vertical]: CATEGORIES_KEYS.unit,

};

return categoryMap[category] || category;

};

codecov · 2024-11-11T17:26:32Z

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 93.87097% with 19 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 93.02%. Comparing base (9b4cf87) to head (7429b68).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/course-unit/context/iFrameContext.tsx	56.25%	7 Missing ⚠️
src/course-unit/data/thunk.js	82.14%	5 Missing ⚠️
src/course-unit/hooks.jsx	72.22%	5 Missing ⚠️
src/course-unit/context/hooks.tsx	85.71%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/course-unit/move-modal/hooks.tsx	98.93%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1422      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.01%   93.02%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1048     1059      +11     
  Lines       20480    20789     +309     
  Branches     4402     4402              
==========================================
+ Hits        19049    19339     +290     
- Misses       1361     1382      +21     
+ Partials       70       68       -2

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

open-craft-grove · 2024-11-11T17:46:34Z

Sandbox deployment successful 🚀
🎓 LMS
📝 Studio
ℹ️ Grove Config, Tutor Config, Tutor Requirements

open-craft-grove · 2024-11-11T18:15:32Z

Sandbox deployment successful 🚀
🎓 LMS
📝 Studio
ℹ️ Grove Config, Tutor Config, Tutor Requirements

bradenmacdonald · 2024-11-12T20:28:30Z

src/course-unit/data/api.js

+/**
+ * Get an object containing course outline data.
+ * @param {string} courseId - The identifier of the course.
+ * @returns {Promise<Object>}


Would it be possible for you to specify the actual shape of the data returned, instead of just Object ?

bradenmacdonald · 2024-11-12T20:28:34Z

src/course-unit/data/api.js

+ * Move a unit item to new unit.
+ * @param {string} sourceLocator - The ID of the item to be moved.
+ * @param {string} targetParentLocator - The ID of the XBlock associated with the item.
+ * @returns {Promise<Object>} - A promise that resolves to the response data from the server.


Would it be possible for you to specify the actual shape of the data returned, instead of just Object ?

bradenmacdonald · 2024-11-12T20:29:16Z

src/course-unit/move-modal/components/EmptyMessage.tsx

+EmptyMessage.propTypes = {
+  category: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
+  categoryText: PropTypes.string.isRequired,
+};


You can omit propTypes from .tsx files if you want.

open-craft-grove · 2024-11-13T11:47:49Z

Sandbox deployment successful 🚀
🎓 LMS
📝 Studio
ℹ️ Grove Config, Tutor Config, Tutor Requirements

openedx-webhooks added the open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U label Oct 22, 2024

mphilbrick211 added the FC Relates to an Axim Funded Contribution project label Oct 22, 2024

ihor-romaniuk mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2024

feat: [FC-0070] add message events to the unit page container openedx/edx-platform#35693

Open

This was referenced Nov 6, 2024

feat: [FC-0070] rendering library content in unit page #1475

Draft

feat: [FC-0070] rendering library content in unit page openedx/edx-platform#35785

Draft

ihor-romaniuk commented Nov 7, 2024

View reviewed changes

src/course-unit/data/thunk.js Show resolved Hide resolved

ihor-romaniuk force-pushed the romaniuk/implement-move-xblock-modal branch from c917065 to 1a9145e Compare November 8, 2024 17:46

ihor-romaniuk marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2024 17:46

ihor-romaniuk requested a review from a team as a code owner November 8, 2024 17:46

ihor-romaniuk force-pushed the romaniuk/implement-move-xblock-modal branch from 1a9145e to de9f97c Compare November 8, 2024 18:08

arbrandes self-requested a review November 8, 2024 18:17

ihor-romaniuk force-pushed the romaniuk/implement-move-xblock-modal branch 3 times, most recently from 0d617b7 to 062e439 Compare November 8, 2024 18:28

ihor-romaniuk added the create-sandbox open-craft-grove should create a sandbox environment from this PR label Nov 8, 2024

PKulkoRaccoonGang suggested changes Nov 11, 2024

View reviewed changes

PKulkoRaccoonGang assigned ihor-romaniuk Nov 11, 2024

ihor-romaniuk force-pushed the romaniuk/implement-move-xblock-modal branch from 64a02a0 to 54ddf6b Compare November 11, 2024 17:15

PKulkoRaccoonGang added create-sandbox open-craft-grove should create a sandbox environment from this PR and removed create-sandbox open-craft-grove should create a sandbox environment from this PR labels Nov 12, 2024

bradenmacdonald reviewed Nov 12, 2024

View reviewed changes

bradenmacdonald mentioned this pull request Nov 13, 2024

Update workflow for library-sourced content (Authoring MFE - Unit Page) #1464

Open

feat: [FC-0070] implement move xblock modal

7429b68

ihor-romaniuk force-pushed the romaniuk/implement-move-xblock-modal branch from 54ddf6b to 7429b68 Compare November 13, 2024 11:13

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

feat: [FC-0070] implement move xblock modal #1422

feat: [FC-0070] implement move xblock modal #1422

ihor-romaniuk commented Oct 22, 2024 •

edited

Loading

openedx-webhooks commented Oct 22, 2024 •

edited

Loading

open-craft-grove commented Nov 8, 2024

PKulkoRaccoonGang left a comment

PKulkoRaccoonGang Nov 11, 2024

ihor-romaniuk Nov 11, 2024

PKulkoRaccoonGang Nov 11, 2024

ihor-romaniuk Nov 11, 2024

PKulkoRaccoonGang Nov 11, 2024

ihor-romaniuk Nov 11, 2024

PKulkoRaccoonGang Nov 11, 2024

ihor-romaniuk Nov 11, 2024

PKulkoRaccoonGang Nov 11, 2024

ihor-romaniuk Nov 11, 2024

PKulkoRaccoonGang Nov 11, 2024

ihor-romaniuk Nov 11, 2024

PKulkoRaccoonGang Nov 11, 2024

ihor-romaniuk Nov 11, 2024

PKulkoRaccoonGang Nov 11, 2024

ihor-romaniuk Nov 11, 2024

PKulkoRaccoonGang Nov 11, 2024

ihor-romaniuk Nov 11, 2024

PKulkoRaccoonGang Nov 11, 2024

ihor-romaniuk Nov 11, 2024

codecov bot commented Nov 11, 2024 •

edited

Loading

open-craft-grove commented Nov 11, 2024

open-craft-grove commented Nov 11, 2024

bradenmacdonald Nov 12, 2024

ihor-romaniuk Nov 13, 2024

bradenmacdonald Nov 12, 2024

ihor-romaniuk Nov 13, 2024

bradenmacdonald Nov 12, 2024

ihor-romaniuk Nov 13, 2024

open-craft-grove commented Nov 13, 2024

	const currentSectionItemText = getByRole('button', {
	const currentSectionItemBtn = getByRole('button', {

	const currentSubsectionText = getByRole('button', {
	const currentSectionItemBtn = getByRole('button', {

	data-testId="move-xblock-modal-category"
	data-testid="move-xblock-modal-category"

feat: [FC-0070] implement move xblock modal #1422

Are you sure you want to change the base?

feat: [FC-0070] implement move xblock modal #1422

Conversation

ihor-romaniuk commented Oct 22, 2024 • edited Loading

Description

Related Pull Requests

Testing instructions

openedx-webhooks commented Oct 22, 2024 • edited Loading

What's next?

🔘 Get product approval

🔘 Provide context

🔘 Get a green build

🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:

Who will review my changes?

Where can I find more information?

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

open-craft-grove commented Nov 8, 2024

PKulkoRaccoonGang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codecov bot commented Nov 11, 2024 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

open-craft-grove commented Nov 11, 2024

open-craft-grove commented Nov 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

open-craft-grove commented Nov 13, 2024

ihor-romaniuk commented Oct 22, 2024 •

edited

Loading

openedx-webhooks commented Oct 22, 2024 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Nov 11, 2024 •

edited

Loading