fix: Show published count component in library content picker [FC-0062]

[ChrisChV]

Description

When using the library component picker, show the correct number on component count (published components) in collection cards.

• Which edX user roles will this change impact? "Course Author"

Supporting information

Github issue: openedx/modular-learning#234
Internal ticket: FAL-3921
Depends on: openedx/edx-platform#35734

Testing instructions

• Use this branch of edx-paltform: fix: Keep sync component count in collection card [FC-0062] edx-platform#35734
• Go library home page of a library
• Create or use a collection
• Create components in the collection
• Publish the library
• Create new components, but not publish the library
• Go to a unit in a course and add a "Library content", using the legacy UI
• Select your library and search your collection
• Check that in the collection card, the component count shows only the published components

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @ChrisChV!

What's next?

Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review:

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

• If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
  • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
• If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

• Dependencies

  This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

• Blockers

  This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

• Timeline information

  This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

• Partner information

  This is for a course on edx.org.

• Supporting documentation
• Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:

Who will review my changes?

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/2u-tnl. Tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for review.

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

• Overview of Review Process for Community Contributions
• Pull Request Status Guide
• Making changes to your pull request

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

• The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
• The need for product review
• Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.28%. Comparing base (fc94667) to head (33492d7).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1481   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.27%   93.28%           
=======================================
  Files        1052     1052           
  Lines       20496    20506   +10     
  Branches     4393     4388    -5     
=======================================
+ Hits        19118    19129   +11     
+ Misses       1315     1314    -1     
  Partials       63       63           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[pomegranited]

[retracted] -- my bad, I wasn't running the right branch. 😊

[pomegranited]

@ChrisChV [retracted] -- my bad, this is not a problem, I wasn't running the right branch.

[pomegranited]

👍 Works great, thank you @ChrisChV !

Apologies for the noise in my previous comments :)

• I tested this using my tutor dev stack and the PR test instructions.
• I read through the code
• I checked for accessibility issues N/A
• Includes documentation N/A
• User-facing strings are extracted for translation N/A

[pomegranited]

👍 Works beautifully, thanks @ChrisChV !

• I tested this using the PR test instructions
• I read through the code
• I checked for accessibility issues N/A
• Includes documentation N/A
• User-facing strings are extracted for translation N/A