Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: corrected ratio tokens type and renamed edx theme #3286

Conversation

PKulkoRaccoonGang
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR provides some minor improvements:

  • ratio type changed to number in Design tokens
  • theme title changed from edx to edx.org

Merge Checklist

  • If your update includes visual changes, have they been reviewed by a designer? Send them a link to the Netlify deploy preview, if applicable.
  • Does your change adhere to the documented style conventions?
  • Do any prop types have missing descriptions in the Props API tables in the documentation site (check deploy preview)?
  • Were your changes tested using all available themes (see theme switcher in the header of the deploy preview, under the "Settings" icon)?
  • Were your changes tested in the example app?
  • Is there adequate test coverage for your changes?
  • Consider whether this change needs to reviewed/QA'ed for accessibility (a11y). If so, please request an a11y review for the PR in the #wg-paragon Open edX Slack channel.

Post-merge Checklist

  • Verify your changes were released to NPM at the expected version.
  • If you'd like, share your contribution in #show-and-tell.
  • 🎉 🙌 Celebrate! Thanks for your contribution.

@openedx-webhooks openedx-webhooks added the open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U label Nov 13, 2024
@openedx-webhooks
Copy link

Thanks for the pull request, @PKulkoRaccoonGang!

What's next?

Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review:

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

  • If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
    • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
  • If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

  • Dependencies

    This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

  • Blockers

    This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

  • Timeline information

    This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

  • Partner information

    This is for a course on edx.org.

  • Supporting documentation
  • Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:

Who will review my changes?

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/paragon-working-group. Tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for review.

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

  • The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
  • The need for product review
  • Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.76%. Comparing base (0ea4cb8) to head (62babd1).
Report is 1 commits behind head on Peter_Kulko/style-dictionary-v4.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                       Coverage Diff                        @@
##           Peter_Kulko/style-dictionary-v4    #3286   +/-   ##
================================================================
  Coverage                            93.76%   93.76%           
================================================================
  Files                                  229      229           
  Lines                                 3784     3784           
  Branches                               906      908    +2     
================================================================
  Hits                                  3548     3548           
+ Misses                                 232      229    -3     
- Partials                                 4        7    +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@adamstankiewicz adamstankiewicz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! Thanks :)

@PKulkoRaccoonGang PKulkoRaccoonGang merged commit bc91888 into Peter_Kulko/style-dictionary-v4 Nov 18, 2024
6 checks passed
@PKulkoRaccoonGang PKulkoRaccoonGang deleted the Peter_Kulko/corrected-ratio-tokens-type branch November 18, 2024 10:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants