Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat(java-sdk): implement batchCheck, listRelations, and non-transaction write #235

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 22, 2023
Merged

feat(java-sdk): implement batchCheck, listRelations, and non-transaction write #235

merged 8 commits into from
Nov 22, 2023

Conversation

booniepepper
Copy link
Contributor

Description

  • feat(java-sdk): implement listRelations, batchCheck, and non-transaction write

References

Generates openfga/java-sdk#32

Review Checklist

  • I have clicked on "allow edits by maintainers".
  • I have added documentation for new/changed functionality in this PR or in a PR to openfga.dev [Provide a link to any relevant PRs in the references section above]
  • The correct base branch is being used, if not main
  • I have added tests to validate that the change in functionality is working as expected

@booniepepper booniepepper requested a review from a team as a code owner November 18, 2023 01:59
@booniepepper booniepepper mentioned this pull request Nov 18, 2023
Merged
4 tasks
adriantam
adriantam previously approved these changes Nov 22, 2023
View reviewed changes
@adriantam adriantam added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 22, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit a30534e Nov 22, 2023
11 checks passed
@adriantam adriantam deleted the java/feat/batching branch November 22, 2023 21:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@adriantam adriantam adriantam approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@booniepepper @adriantam