Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cosmetic issues with the new structured packagings page #3507

Open
4 of 7 tasks
monsieurtanuki opened this issue Jan 3, 2023 · 20 comments
Open
4 of 7 tasks

Cosmetic issues with the new structured packagings page #3507

monsieurtanuki opened this issue Jan 3, 2023 · 20 comments
Labels
✏️ Editing - Packaging input Related to the structured input of food packaging.

Comments

@monsieurtanuki
Copy link
Contributor

monsieurtanuki commented Jan 3, 2023

The new structured packagings page was written quickly, as a Minimum Viable Page.

There are pending less important issues:

Tasks

Part of

@monsieurtanuki monsieurtanuki added the 🐛 bug Something isn't working label Jan 3, 2023
@teolemon teolemon added the ✏️ Editing - Packaging input Related to the structured input of food packaging. label Jan 3, 2023
@teolemon
Copy link
Member

teolemon commented Jan 4, 2023

  • Ok, surprise demo with the Cabinet Ministériel tomorrow morning to check if the minister can put her skin promoting the app, it seems.

potential beef up ideas

  • I think a little space between the fields would go a long way to make it feel cleaner
  • Perhaps we can add the icons from the maximalist design
    capacity
    counter
    material
    recycling
    shape
    weight

@teolemon
Copy link
Member

teolemon commented Jan 4, 2023

Can we add warnings ?
"Hint: Sometimes, the materials like ♵ are hidden below the pack, in 3D, on the plastic."
"Hint: For accurate packaging weight measurements, please clean any food residue and then dry any water."

@monsieurtanuki
Copy link
Contributor Author

@teolemon I think I accidentally added spaces in #3513 (cf. screenshot) - is that spaced enough?
Do you have the URLs or SVGs for the logos?
It could be something like that:
Capture d’écran 2023-01-04 à 12 24 41

@monsieurtanuki
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can we add warnings ?

Like that, repeated for each component? Or just written for the first component? Or written on top of the page? Or written somewhere else?
Capture d’écran 2023-01-04 à 12 35 54

@teolemon
Copy link
Member

teolemon commented Jan 4, 2023

The svgs are above

@teolemon
Copy link
Member

teolemon commented Jan 4, 2023

I think we can repeat for now.

@monsieurtanuki
Copy link
Contributor Author

The svgs are above

Yes and no: as far as I'm concerned, I see a copy/paste of black raster icons, but nothing vectorial.

@teolemon
Copy link
Member

teolemon commented Jan 4, 2023

I would make the field title full width, so that it does not compete for width with the field

@monsieurtanuki
Copy link
Contributor Author

I would make the field title full width, so that it does not compete for width with the field

You mean ICON + TITLE on one line (possibly with a hint as subtitle), and one line below the field (but still half the screen width, right?).
If you ask me it looks like a lot of wasted space. So don't ask me ;)
Capture d’écran 2023-01-04 à 12 58 03

@monsieurtanuki
Copy link
Contributor Author

For the repeated hints, we could do like in simple input pages: an optional info icon that opens the full info:

collapsed expanded
Capture d’écran 2023-01-04 à 13 00 31 Capture d’écran 2023-01-04 à 13 02 17

@teolemon
Copy link
Member

teolemon commented Jan 4, 2023

The counter and material are raster, damn, fixing that
I was thinking full screen width, but given multiple components, that might be way too much vertical space, indeed

@teolemon
Copy link
Member

teolemon commented Jan 4, 2023

counter

@teolemon
Copy link
Member

teolemon commented Jan 4, 2023

I have to run now, I can do something custom, but meanwhile: here's https://world-fr.openfoodfacts.org/images/lang/en/packaging/04-ldpe.90x90.svg

@teolemon
Copy link
Member

teolemon commented Jan 4, 2023

Right clicking the minitatures all should point you to SVGs

@teolemon
Copy link
Member

teolemon commented Jan 4, 2023

Could we build the card title as we input it ?
"Component #1 - {nb_of_units} {material} {shape}"

@monsieurtanuki
Copy link
Contributor Author

We don't have enough space to put both on the same line. Suggestions:

number first number last
Capture d’écran 2023-01-04 à 16 23 55 Capture d’écran 2023-01-04 à 16 25 14

With the side effect for the "number last" suggestion when the component is empty - there's no title and just a subtitle.
Capture d’écran 2023-01-04 à 16 27 41
Could be easily solved with the following:

  • if the component is empty, "number first" (a 'component n°1' title and no subtitle)
  • else, "number last" (a data relevant title and a 'component n°1' subtitle)

@monsieurtanuki
Copy link
Contributor Author

That said, the autocomplete feature is flawed and the slightest change to it makes the app behaves unpredictably.
Therefore, refreshing the component label is definitely not for today.

@teolemon
Copy link
Member

teolemon commented Jan 4, 2023

I've had backlash on putting the field and the title and the icon on the same line, from @alexgarel who has a small device.

In the initial mockup, this was edge to edge, so let's try going this way (plus icons possibly)
image

@teolemon
Copy link
Member

teolemon commented Jan 5, 2023

# Unit = element, not unit of measure
msgctxt "packaging_number_of_units_description"
msgid "Enter the number of packaging units of the same shape and material contained in the product."
msgstr "Enter the number of packaging units of the same shape and material contained in the product."

msgctxt "packaging_shape_description"
msgid "Enter the shape name listed in the recycling instructions if they are available, or select a shape."
msgstr "Enter the shape name listed in the recycling instructions if they are available, or select a shape."

msgctxt "packaging_material_description"
msgid "Enter the specific material if it can be determined (a material code inside a triangle can often be found on packaging parts), or a generic material (for instance plastic or metal) if you are unsure."
msgstr "Enter the specific material if it can be determined (a material code inside a triangle can often be found on packaging parts), or a generic material (for instance plastic or metal) if you are unsure."

msgctxt "packaging_recycling_description"
msgid "Enter recycling instructions only if they are listed on the product."
msgstr "Enter recycling instructions only if they are listed on the product."

# Unit = element, not unit of measure
msgctxt "packaging_weight_description"
msgid "Remove any remaining food and wash and dry the packaging part before weighting. If possible, use a scale with 0.1g or 0.01g precision."
msgstr "Remove any remaining food and wash and dry the packaging part before weighting. If possible, use a scale with 0.1g or 0.01g precision."

# Unit = element, not unit of measure
msgctxt "packaging_quantity_per_unit_description"
msgid "Enter the net weight or net volume and indicate the unit (for example g or ml)."
msgstr "Enter the net weight or net volume and indicate the unit (for example g or ml)."

@monsieurtanuki
Copy link
Contributor Author

@teolemon Do you mean you want those info/hints for each item, instead of just info/hints for material and weight?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
✏️ Editing - Packaging input Related to the structured input of food packaging.
Projects
Status: No status
Status: 💬 To discuss and validate
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants