fix: externalyse geometries management

[12rambau]

I needed to get geometries both with and without GEE for my work and realized I didn't wanted to use the whole sepal_ui suits. The method developped for getting geometries were well designed so I exported it in their own libs: pygadm and pygaul.

In order to avoid duplicate work, and to reduce the size of sepal_ui I proposed in this PR to rely on these 2 extra libs to get GAUL and GADM data.

• I updated aoi_model so that _from_admin use get_items method from both lib
• I updated the aoi_view to use get_names in the AdminSelect dropdown
• dropped the parquet dataset and reduce the size of the lib
• PyGAUL and pyGADM relies on requests_cahce for managing their download so they are faster than the regular downnloads we were using.

side effects:

• I corrected the bug with the planet data_regression.
• There was a small bug with the aoi_view when used without map (reset was bugging because of the w_draw v_model)

I checked it manually and didn't changed any of the tests so normally if we did a decent job at making them this modification should be transparent in applications.

Fix #860

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #868 (7a32787) into main (6b5eee2) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head 7a32787 differs from pull request most recent head 358194e. Consider uploading reports for the commit 358194e to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #868      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.55%   96.57%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          39       39              
  Lines        3804     3796       -8     
==========================================
- Hits         3673     3666       -7     
+ Misses        131      130       -1     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
sepal_ui/aoi/aoi_model.py	89.02% <100.00%> (-0.17%)	⬇️
sepal_ui/aoi/aoi_view.py	98.91% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️

[12rambau]

I recently added a class implementation of both of them, let's use this one instead

[12rambau]

@dfguerrerom any chance to get a review on this one or should I proceed with the merge ?

[dfguerrerom]

@dfguerrerom any chance to get a review on this one or should I proceed with the merge ?

give me a couple of days more please, these days have been a bit crazy.

[12rambau]

No problem I was just checking you were still around

[dfguerrerom]

this is a nice implementation, I'm not sure about the name of the classes but that's something non related with this PR.