8350892: [JVMCI] Align ResolvedJavaType.getInstanceFields with Class.getDeclaredFields #23849
+57
−71
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The current order of fields returned by
ResolvedJavaType.getInstanceFields
is a) not well specified and b) different than the order of fields used almost everywhere else in HotSpot. This PR aligns the order ofgetInstanceFields
withClass.getDeclaredFields()
.There is a second commit in this PR that makes
ciInstanceKlass::_nonstatic_fields
also use the same order which unifies how deoptimization treats fields across C2 and JVMCI. While this commit could be removed, the unification is nice and I cannot see a major downside to it.Progress
Issue
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23849/head:pull/23849
$ git checkout pull/23849
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23849
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23849/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23849
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23849
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23849.diff