Skip to content

8357647 : Stream gatherers forward upstream size information to downstream #25418

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

viktorklang-ora
Copy link
Contributor

@viktorklang-ora viktorklang-ora commented May 23, 2025

While it could be argued that unbounded Spliterators should not report SIZED / SUBSIZED, GatherSink should report an unknown emission size, so switching to downstream.begin(-1) rather than downstream.begin(size).

Includes a regression test which yields an OOME if this change is omitted.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8357647: Stream gatherers forward upstream size information to downstream (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25418/head:pull/25418
$ git checkout pull/25418

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25418
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25418/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25418

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25418

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25418.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 23, 2025

👋 Welcome back vklang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 23, 2025

@viktorklang-ora This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8357647: Stream gatherers forward upstream size information to downstream

Reviewed-by: liach, alanb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 54 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label May 23, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 23, 2025

@viktorklang-ora The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 23, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@liach liach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks sensible; an integrator may push an arbitrary number of items to the downstream.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 23, 2025
@@ -465,6 +466,41 @@ public void testExceptionInFinisher(Config config) {
, expectedMessage);
}

@ParameterizedTest
@ValueSource(booleans = { false, true })
public void mustNotPropagateSizeInformation(boolean parallel) {
Copy link

@mariokhoury4 mariokhoury4 May 24, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @mariokhoury4, thanks for making a comment in an OpenJDK project!

All comments and discussions in the OpenJDK Community must be made available under the OpenJDK Terms of Use. If you already are an OpenJDK Author, Committer or Reviewer, please click here to open a new issue so that we can record that fact. Please Use "Add GitHub user mariokhoury4" for the summary.

If you are not an OpenJDK Author, Committer or Reviewer, simply check the box below to accept the OpenJDK Terms of Use for your comments.

Your comment will be automatically restored once you have accepted the OpenJDK Terms of Use.

Copy link
Contributor

@AlanBateman AlanBateman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks okay, I assume you'll bump the copyright headers before integration.

@viktorklang-ora
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 27, 2025

Going to push as commit aea32ec.
Since your change was applied there have been 64 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 27, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 27, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 27, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 27, 2025

@viktorklang-ora Pushed as commit aea32ec.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants