Skip to content

8360024: Reorganize GC VM operations and implement is_gc_operation #25896

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JonasNorlinder
Copy link
Contributor

@JonasNorlinder JonasNorlinder commented Jun 19, 2025

JDK-8359110 introduces a need to be able to categorize VM operations to be able to track GC activity in the VM thread for CPU time tracking. This patch will reorganize the shared GC VM operations in gcVMOperations.hpp to make a distinction between GC operations and serviceability/CDS etc. operations performed in the VM thread for the GC.

Additionally the ability to query is_gc_operation() is introduced in the base class VM_Operation and overridden in appropriate VM operations. This provides a clear and efficient interface to query the category of a VM operation.

Proposed changes in the shared class hierarchy:

//  VM_Operation
//    VM_Heap_Sync_Operation
//      VM_GC_Operation
//        VM_GC_Collect_Operation
//          VM_SerialGCCollect
//          VM_ParallelGCCollect
//          VM_CollectForAllocation
//            VM_SerialCollectForAllocation
//            VM_ParallelCollectForAllocation
//          VM_CollectForMetadataAllocation
//        VM_GC_Service_Operation
//          VM_GC_HeapInspection
//      VM_Verify
//      VM_PopulateDynamicDumpSharedSpace
//      VM_PopulateDumpSharedSpace

Renaming VM_GC_Sync_Operation to VM_Heap_Sync_Operation to make it clear that not all sub-classes is related to GC (shout-out to @kstefanj / @stefank for that suggestion). While VM_GC_HeapInspection is a serviceability operation it attempts to trigger a collection, hence it is put underneath VM_GC_Collect_Operation->VM_GC_Service_Operation. However only classes that inherits from VM_GC_Collect_Operation are considered to return true for is_gc_operation() as VM_GC_HeapInspection is considered to not belong to "GC activity".

ZGC and Shenandoah do not use sub-classing of VM_Heap_Sync_Operation, but their respective base classes and special classes for GC activity are marked as returning true for is_gc_operation().

The only is_XX_operation that is specified in VM_Operation is is_gc_operation to not clutter with cases that are not used (is_gc_operation will be used by JDK-8359110). That being said, these behavioral queries may be extended in case we want to explore CPU time tracking beyond the GC component.

Note: PR for JDK-8359110 already contains a proposal for is_gc_operation but it was deemed that it was more appropriate to bring along that change during reorganization of GC VM operations since implementing it at the correct places without this change would require a lot more overrides...


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8360024: Reorganize GC VM operations and implement is_gc_operation (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25896/head:pull/25896
$ git checkout pull/25896

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25896
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25896/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25896

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25896

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25896.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 19, 2025

👋 Welcome back JonasNorlinder! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@JonasNorlinder
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label add hotspot-gc hotspot-runtime

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 19, 2025

@JonasNorlinder This change is no longer ready for integration - check the PR body for details.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 19, 2025

@JonasNorlinder
The hotspot-gc label was successfully added.

The hotspot-runtime label was successfully added.

@JonasNorlinder JonasNorlinder marked this pull request as ready for review June 19, 2025 13:14
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 19, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 19, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks quite reasonable to me. Obviously GC folk get final approval.

One minor nit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 20, 2025
@JonasNorlinder
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the review @dholmes-ora.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants