Skip to content

8362203: assert(state == nullptr || state->get_thread_oop() != nullptr) failed: incomplete state #26303

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

lmesnik
Copy link
Member

@lmesnik lmesnik commented Jul 14, 2025

The problem happens if post_early_vm_start is triggered.
The fix is to complete initialization once threadObj become available.

I'vent observed that recompute_enable and hitting assertion might happens before this step. However it might be makes sense to check state in assertion if needed.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8362203: assert(state == nullptr || state->get_thread_oop() != nullptr) failed: incomplete state (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26303/head:pull/26303
$ git checkout pull/26303

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26303
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26303/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26303

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26303

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26303.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 14, 2025

👋 Welcome back lmesnik! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 14, 2025

@lmesnik This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8362203: assert(state == nullptr || state->get_thread_oop() != nullptr) failed: incomplete state

Reviewed-by: sspitsyn, amenkov

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 54 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 14, 2025

@lmesnik The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot
  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@lmesnik lmesnik marked this pull request as ready for review July 15, 2025 03:02
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 15, 2025
@lmesnik
Copy link
Member Author

lmesnik commented Jul 15, 2025

I renamed function just to make clear that it should be used once in startup phase.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 15, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@sspitsyn sspitsyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good in general. Thank you for catching with Kitchensink and fixing this issue!
I've posted a couple of nits.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 16, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@sspitsyn sspitsyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for updates! Looks good.

@lmesnik
Copy link
Member Author

lmesnik commented Jul 17, 2025

@sspitsyn, @alexmenkov Thank you for review!
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 17, 2025

Going to push as commit bd55d7a.
Since your change was applied there have been 65 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 17, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 17, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 17, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 17, 2025

@lmesnik Pushed as commit bd55d7a.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants