8358004: Delete applications/scimark/Scimark.java test

[sendaoYan]

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit a5c9bc70 from the openjdk/jdk repository. The Scimark is not maintained, this backport PR remove this useless tests which cause test failure. Test-fix only, no risk.

The commit being backported was authored by Leonid Mesnik on 16 Jul 2025 and was reviewed by SendaoYan and Coleen Phillimore.

Thanks!

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8358004: Delete applications/scimark/Scimark.java test (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

• Coleen Phillimore (@coleenp - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26338/head:pull/26338
$ git checkout pull/26338

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/26338
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/26338/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 26338

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 26338

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26338.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back syan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into jdk25 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@sendaoYan This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8358004: Delete applications/scimark/Scimark.java test

Reviewed-by: coleenp

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 19 new commits pushed to the jdk25 branch:

• e989c1d: 8362429: AssertionError in File.listFiles(FileFilter | FilenameFilter)
• 5129887: 8362250: ARM32: forward_exception_entry missing return address
• 69ea85e: 8361587: AssertionError in File.listFiles() when path is empty and -esa is enabled
• ... and 16 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/e1926a6d0e3252d2d3f16a93afaac4c289052148...jdk25

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the jdk25 branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[openjdk]

@sendaoYan To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.

Applicable Labels

• build
• client
• compiler
• core-libs
• graal
• hotspot
• hotspot-compiler
• hotspot-gc
• hotspot-jfr
• hotspot-runtime
• i18n
• ide-support
• javadoc
• jdk
• jmx
• net
• nio
• security
• serviceability
• shenandoah

[sendaoYan]

/cc hotspot
/cc hotspot-runtime

[openjdk]

@sendaoYan
The hotspot label was successfully added.

[openjdk]

@sendaoYan
The hotspot-runtime label was successfully added.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (ddbf7bee)

[coleenp]

Looks good.

[sendaoYan]

Looks good.

Thanks for the reviews. @coleenp

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit f1f6452.
Since your change was applied there have been 20 commits pushed to the jdk25 branch:

• 331adac: 8361639: JFR: Incorrect top frame for I/O events
• e989c1d: 8362429: AssertionError in File.listFiles(FileFilter | FilenameFilter)
• 5129887: 8362250: ARM32: forward_exception_entry missing return address
• ... and 17 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/e1926a6d0e3252d2d3f16a93afaac4c289052148...jdk25

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@sendaoYan Pushed as commit f1f6452.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.