8369188: Update link-time check for HotSpot uses of allocation and deallocation functions #28253
+34
−2
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please review this update to the gcc/clang link-time check to prevent HotSpot
code from using the C++ global allocator. A number of overloads for allocation
and deallocation functions have been added since C++03 and were missing from
the list being checked for.
Testing: mach5 tier1, GHA sanity tests (in progress)
Locally (linux-aarch64) added uses of some of these functions and verified
they caused the expected link-time failures. Manually verified applying
c++filt to all the names in the updated list demangle to the expected function
names.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28253/head:pull/28253$ git checkout pull/28253Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28253$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28253/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28253View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28253Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28253.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment