Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8334297: (so) java/nio/channels/SocketChannel/OpenLeak.java should not depend on SecurityManager #819

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

luchenlin
Copy link

@luchenlin luchenlin commented Jul 4, 2024

I backport this for parity with 21.0.5-oracle.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8334297 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8334297: (so) java/nio/channels/SocketChannel/OpenLeak.java should not depend on SecurityManager (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/819/head:pull/819
$ git checkout pull/819

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/819
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/819/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 819

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 819

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/819.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 4, 2024

👋 Welcome back andrewlu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 4, 2024

@luchenlin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8334297: (so) java/nio/channels/SocketChannel/OpenLeak.java should not depend on SecurityManager

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 10 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3e638bf: 8316361: C2: assert(!failure) failed: Missed optimization opportunity in PhaseIterGVN with -XX:VerifyIterativeGVN=10
  • b48b8e1: 8333804: java/net/httpclient/ForbiddenHeadTest.java threw an exception with 0 failures
  • 1064076: 8331798: Remove unused arg of checkErgonomics() in TestMaxHeapSizeTools.java
  • 7991298: 8334653: ISO 4217 Amendment 177 Update
  • 7027274: 8333353: Delete extra empty line in CodeBlob.java
  • c8fe1a1: 8334600: TEST java/net/MulticastSocket/IPMulticastIF.java fails on linux-aarch64
  • 4f82229: 6967482: TAB-key does not work in JTables after selecting details-view in JFileChooser
  • cba69c8: 8332524: Instead of printing "TLSv1.3," it is showing "TLS13"
  • 34175fc: 8333270: HandlersOnComplexResetUpdate and HandlersOnComplexUpdate tests fail with "Unexpected reference" if timeoutFactor is less than 1/3
  • 306aeab: 8280988: [XWayland] Click on title to request focus test failures

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 50bed6c67b1edd7736bdf79308d135a4e1047ff0 8334297: (so) java/nio/channels/SocketChannel/OpenLeak.java should not depend on SecurityManager Jul 4, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 4, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 4, 2024

⚠️ @luchenlin This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 4, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 4, 2024

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added approval ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Jul 5, 2024
@luchenlin
Copy link
Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 8, 2024

Going to push as commit 6ff7e2a.
Since your change was applied there have been 11 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 2c2cd9b: 8327401: Some jtreg tests fail on Wayland without any tracking bug
  • 3e638bf: 8316361: C2: assert(!failure) failed: Missed optimization opportunity in PhaseIterGVN with -XX:VerifyIterativeGVN=10
  • b48b8e1: 8333804: java/net/httpclient/ForbiddenHeadTest.java threw an exception with 0 failures
  • 1064076: 8331798: Remove unused arg of checkErgonomics() in TestMaxHeapSizeTools.java
  • 7991298: 8334653: ISO 4217 Amendment 177 Update
  • 7027274: 8333353: Delete extra empty line in CodeBlob.java
  • c8fe1a1: 8334600: TEST java/net/MulticastSocket/IPMulticastIF.java fails on linux-aarch64
  • 4f82229: 6967482: TAB-key does not work in JTables after selecting details-view in JFileChooser
  • cba69c8: 8332524: Instead of printing "TLSv1.3," it is showing "TLS13"
  • 34175fc: 8333270: HandlersOnComplexResetUpdate and HandlersOnComplexUpdate tests fail with "Unexpected reference" if timeoutFactor is less than 1/3
  • ... and 1 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/compare/b6be31a5868a09dd3556fa3dc4c0eee8abe2cdb3...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 8, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 8, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 8, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 8, 2024

@luchenlin Pushed as commit 6ff7e2a.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
1 participant