-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 486
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8347305: RichTextArea Follow-up #1671
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
8347305: RichTextArea Follow-up #1671
Conversation
👋 Welcome back angorya! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@andy-goryachev-oracle This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Webrevs
|
It might just be an issue with the demo, because I don't see it on a simple test program I wrote. Whether or not it works as designed, it looks ugly (and it's distracting as you navigate down the page with the keyboard). Here is a screen shot. Anyway, I don't mind addressing this later, and not part of this PR. |
I see "use content width" option enabled, this is not the right use case. When the RTA is constrained, the useContentWidth should be off. |
It looks like you missed capturing the bug for this comment. The second example in the RTA class docs doesn't compile. It needs to be updated to reflect an earlier change in the API:
Can you either fix it as part of this PR or file a new bug? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
The changes:
addWithStyles
-->addWithStyleNames
The following is not an issue (works as designed):
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jfx.git pull/1671/head:pull/1671
$ git checkout pull/1671
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1671
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jfx.git pull/1671/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1671
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1671
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1671.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment