Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8320761: [Lilliput] Implement compact identity hashcode #192

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: pr/191
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rkennke
Copy link
Collaborator

@rkennke rkennke commented Dec 17, 2024

WIP


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Integration blocker

 ⚠️ Dependency #191 must be integrated first

Issue

  • JDK-8320761: [Lilliput] Implement compact identity hashcode (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/lilliput.git pull/192/head:pull/192
$ git checkout pull/192

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/192
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/lilliput.git pull/192/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 192

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 192

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/lilliput/pull/192.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 17, 2024

👋 Welcome back rkennke! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into pr/191 will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 17, 2024

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@rkennke rkennke force-pushed the JDK-8320761 branch 4 times, most recently from 977444a to 6261dce Compare December 19, 2024 14:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant