-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[PRE REVIEW]: madupite: A High-Performance Distributed Solver for Large-Scale Markov Decision Processes #7247
Comments
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
|
|
Software report:
Commit count by author:
|
Paper file info: 📄 Wordcount for ✅ The paper includes a |
License info: ✅ License found: |
Five most similar historical JOSS papers: PyBADS: Fast and robust black-box optimization in Python pyOptSparse: A Python framework for large-scale constrained nonlinear optimization of sparse systems Pakman: a modular, efficient and portable tool for approximate Bayesian inference PySD: System Dynamics Modeling in Python pymdp: A Python library for active inference in discrete state spaces |
👋 @gmatilde - thanks for your submission. While I look for an editor, you could work on the possibly missing DOIs that editorialbot suggests, but note that some may be incorrect. Please feel free to make changes to your .bib file, then use the command |
👋 @faroit - would you be able to edit this JOSS submission? |
@editorialbot invite @faroit as editor |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
@danielskatz sorry this is outside of my domain but can probably contribute reviewers once an editor is found |
👋 @logological - Do you think that you could edit this JOSS submission? |
@editorialbot invite @logological as editor |
Invitation to edit this submission sent! |
Dear Daniel, thanks a lot for your message. We have just added the missing DOIs. |
|
@gmatilde - thanks, though it looks like a couple more changes are still needed... (maybe you're working on them now) |
yes :) I just pushed again |
this is a list of reviewers who we think might be interested in reviewing our paper:
|
@editorialbot check references |
|
@editorialbot check references |
|
@editorialbot generate pdf |
Thanks @logological - Given loads on existing reviewers, I'm happy that you are willing to do this. I'll assign it to you now, but no there's no need to start it until next week... |
@editorialbot assign @logological as editor |
Assigned! @logological is now the editor |
@gmatilde I'm now ready to start the editing process – thanks for bearing with me. I see no obvious problems with your suggested reviewers so I'll go ahead and start inviting them. |
hi @logological , currently reviewing 2 submissions already, but thank you for consideration. |
@sixpearls We've received a submission entitled "madupite: A High-Performance Distributed Solver for Large-Scale Markov Decision Processes". Would you be interested in reviewing it for the Journal of Open Source Software? |
@TimKam @sivaramambikasaran @victorapm We've received a submission entitled "madupite: A High-Performance Distributed Solver for Large-Scale Markov Decision Processes". Would you be interested in reviewing it for the Journal of Open Source Software? |
Thanks @logological, I can help reviewing |
Thanks, @victorapm! I'll let you know when we have enough additional reviewers to start the process. |
👋 @logological - how are you doing on finding reviewers? Do you need any help? |
@danielskatz I had to take a brief pause for some submission deadlines. I'll keep working my way through a list of potential reviewers now. |
@alberto743 @lukeolson @bhttchr6 We've received a submission entitled "madupite: A High-Performance Distributed Solver for Large-Scale Markov Decision Processes". Would you be interested in reviewing it for the Journal of Open Source Software? |
@logological Thank you for considering me as a potential reviewer for this work. I already have two other pending reviews for JOSS. Realistically, I will not be available for additional reviews before the beginning of February 2025. If you do not find other reviewers, come back to me in about two months. |
Hello,
Yes, I am interested in reviewing the article.
Thanks,
Regards,
Anurag
…On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 12:31 PM Tristan Miller ***@***.***> wrote:
@alberto743 <https://github.com/alberto743> @lukeolson
<https://github.com/lukeolson> @bhttchr6 <https://github.com/bhttchr6>
We've received a submission entitled "madupite: A High-Performance
Distributed Solver for Large-Scale Markov Decision Processes". Would you be
interested in reviewing it for the Journal of Open Source Software?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#7247 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALK7EVWR2U55NI4CZRXJIJ3Z5FDJPAVCNFSM6AAAAABOQ7N6MGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDIMZWGE4DONZRG4>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
@logological - yes, happy to review. |
Great – we now have enough reviewers to start. I'll set up a separate issue for the review. @lukeolson, @bhttchr6, and @victorapm, you can begin reviewing there right away, or as soon as it's convenient for you. Note that we ask that reviews be completed in two to three weeks, if possible. |
@editorialbot add @lukeolson as reviewer |
@lukeolson added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot add @victorapm as reviewer |
@victorapm added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot add @bhttchr6 as reviewer |
@bhttchr6 added to the reviewers list! |
@editorialbot start review |
OK, I've started the review over in #7411. |
Submitting author: @gmatilde (Matilde Gargiani)
Repository: https://github.com/madupite/madupite
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @logological
Reviewers: @lukeolson, @victorapm, @bhttchr6
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @gmatilde. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@gmatilde if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: