Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SDK-373 - Add goal to packager plugin to facilitate transition from c… #28

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

mseaton
Copy link
Member

@mseaton mseaton commented Dec 17, 2024

…onfig to content packages

@mseaton mseaton requested a review from mogoodrich December 17, 2024 17:46
@mseaton mseaton merged commit 1bbb0a2 into master Dec 17, 2024
1 check passed
@mseaton mseaton deleted the SDK-373 branch December 17, 2024 17:48

/**
* The purpose of this Mojo is to support the migration away from config packages to content packages
* The intent is to bundle up the same configurations as content packages
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Config packages never lived outside of PIH, did they, or am I forgetting? Might be worth referencing these as "PIH" config packages in the comments to help people 10 years from now remember what they were (or just realize they can ignore them)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, right, the packager plugin... maybe just reference that in the comments?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Duh, sorry for all the spam... I was thinking this change was in the SDK... of course you don't need to reference the packager plugin since this is the package plugin... anyway, LGTM, ignore my comments...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants