-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Bump pipeline version #758
Conversation
a12c738
to
f9dfe63
Compare
pyproject.toml
Outdated
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ classifiers = [ | |||
] | |||
requires-python = ">=3.8" | |||
dependencies = [ | |||
"opensafely-pipeline @ git+https://github.com/opensafely-core/[email protected].08.124104", | |||
"opensafely-pipeline[fastparser] @ git+https://github.com/opensafely-core/[email protected].11.170331", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah sorry, confusingly job-runner can't depend on the fastparser
extra because it ends up vendored inside opensafely-cli and we can't vendor compiled dependencies. This is part of the Gordian knot we trying to cut by switching to uv
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Got it, I will switch it back :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can't hard depend on it for the above reason, but we could add it to the job-runner-dependencies so we get the benefit in job-runner in prod.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah yeah, I hadn't thought of that.
f9dfe63
to
7e59d18
Compare
project.yaml
files with empty actions