-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 483
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Faiss byte vector support blog #3458
Changes from all commits
6201283
3f019b2
9b6853d
8934fe1
4206c40
dfd36c6
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@ | ||
--- | ||
layout: post | ||
title: Introducing byte vector support for Faiss in the OpenSearch vector engine | ||
authors: | ||
- naveen | ||
- navneev | ||
- vamshin | ||
- dylantong | ||
- kolchfa | ||
date: 2024-11-22 | ||
categories: | ||
- technical-posts | ||
has_science_table: true | ||
meta_keywords: Faiss byte vectors in OpenSearch, similarity search, vector search, large-scale applications, memory efficiency, quantization techniques, benchmarking results, signed byte range | ||
meta_description: Learn how byte vectors improve memory efficiency and performance in large-scale similarity search applications. Discover benchmarking results, quantization techniques, and use cases for Faiss byte vectors in OpenSearch. | ||
--- | ||
|
||
The growing popularity of generative AI and large language models (LLMs) has led to an increased demand for efficient vector search and similarity operations. These models often rely on high-dimensional vector representations of text, images, or other data. Performing similarity searches or nearest neighbor queries on these vectors becomes computationally expensive, especially as vector databases grow in size. OpenSearch's support for Faiss byte vectors offers a promising solution to these challenges. | ||
|
||
Using byte vectors instead of float vectors for vector search provides significant improvements in memory efficiency and performance. This is especially beneficial for large-scale vector databases or environments with limited resources. Faiss byte vectors enable you to store quantized embeddings, significantly reducing memory consumption and lowering costs. This approach typically results in only minimal recall loss compared to using full-precision (float) vectors. | ||
|
||
|
||
## How to use a Faiss byte vector | ||
|
||
A byte vector is a compact vector representation in which each dimension is a signed 8-bit integer ranging from -128 to 127. To use byte vectors, you must convert your input vectors, typically in `float` format, into the `byte` type before ingestion. This process requires quantization techniques, which compress float vectors while maintaining essential data characteristics. For more information, see [Quantization techniques](https://opensearch.org/docs/latest/field-types/supported-field-types/knn-vector#quantization-techniques). | ||
Check failure on line 25 in _posts/2024-11-22-faiss-byte-vector.md GitHub Actions / style-job
|
||
|
||
To use a `byte` vector, set the `data_type` parameter to `byte` when creating a k-NN index (the default value of the `data_type` parameter is `float`): | ||
|
||
|
||
```json | ||
PUT test-index | ||
{ | ||
"settings": { | ||
"index": { | ||
"knn": true | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
"mappings": { | ||
"properties": { | ||
"my_vector1": { | ||
"type": "knn_vector", | ||
"dimension": 8, | ||
"data_type": "byte", | ||
"method": { | ||
"name": "hnsw", | ||
"space_type": "l2", | ||
"engine": "faiss", | ||
"parameters": { | ||
"ef_construction": 100, | ||
"m": 16 | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
During ingestion, make sure that each dimension of the vector is within the supported [-128, 127] range: | ||
|
||
```json | ||
PUT test-index/_doc/1 | ||
{ | ||
"my_vector": [-126, 28, 127, 0, 10, -45, 12, -110] | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
```json | ||
PUT test-index/_doc/2 | ||
{ | ||
"my_vector": [100, -25, 4, -67, -2, 127, 99, 0] | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
During querying, make sure that the query vector is also within the byte range: | ||
|
||
```json | ||
GET test-index/_search | ||
{ | ||
"size": 2, | ||
"query": { | ||
"knn": { | ||
"my_vector1": { | ||
"vector": [-1, 45, -100, 125, -128, -8, 5, 10], | ||
"k": 2 | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
|
||
**Note**: When using `byte` vectors, expect some loss of recall precision as compared to using `float` vectors. Byte vectors are useful for large-scale applications and use cases that prioritize reducing memory usage in exchange for a minimal loss in recall. | ||
|
||
|
||
## Benchmarking results | ||
|
||
We used OpenSearch Benchmark to run benchmarking tests on popular datasets to compare recall, indexing, and search performance between float vectors and byte vectors using Faiss HNSW. | ||
|
||
**Note**: Without single instruction, multiple data (SIMD) optimization (such as AVX2 or NEON) or when AVX2 is disabled (on x86 architectures), the quantization process introduces additional latency. For more information about AVX2-compatible processors, see [CPUs with AVX2](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Vector_Extensions#CPUs_with_AVX2). In an AWS environment, all community Amazon Machine Images (AMIs) with [HVM](https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/virtualization_types.html) support AVX2 optimization. | ||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Line 99: Should we define SIMD? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Done There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Changed to lowercase |
||
These tests were conducted on a single-node cluster, except for the cohere-10m dataset, which used two `r5.2xlarge` instances. | ||
|
||
### Configuration | ||
|
||
The following table lists the cluster configuration for the benchmarking tests. | ||
|
||
|`m` |`ef_construction` |`ef_search` |Replicas |Primary shards |Indexing clients | | ||
|--- |--- |--- |--- |--- |--- | | ||
|16 |100 |100 |0 |8 |16 | | ||
|
||
The following table lists the dataset configuration for the benchmarking tests. | ||
|
||
|Dataset ID |Dataset |Vector dimension |Data size |Number of queries |Training data range |Query data range |Space type | | ||
|--- |--- |--- |--- |--- |--- |--- |--- | | ||
|**Dataset 1** |gist-960-euclidean |960 |1,000,000 |1,000 |[0.0, 1.48] |[0.0, 0.729] |L2 | | ||
|**Dataset 2** |cohere-ip-10m |768 |10,000,000 |10,000 |[-4.142334, 5.5211477] |[-4.109505, 5.4809895] |innerproduct | | ||
|**Dataset 3** |cohere-ip-1m |768 |1,000,000 |10,000 |[-4.1073565, 5.504557] |[-4.109505, 5.4809895] |innerproduct | | ||
|**Dataset 4** |sift-128-euclidean |128 |1,000,000 |10,000 |[0.0, 218.0] |[0.0, 184.0] |L2 | | ||
|
||
### Recall, memory, and indexing results | ||
|
||
|Dataset ID |Faiss HNSW recall@100 |Faiss HNSW byte recall@100 |% Reduction in recall |Faiss HNSW memory usage (GB) |Faiss HNSW byte memory usage (GB) |% Reduction in memory |Faiss HNSW mean indexing throughput (docs/sec) |Faiss HNSW byte mean indexing throughput (docs/sec) |% Gain in indexing throughput | | ||
|--- |--- |--- |--- |--- |--- |--- |--- |--- |--- | | ||
|**Dataset 1** |0.91 |0.89 |2.20 |3.72 |1.04 |72.00 |4673 |9686 |107.28 | | ||
|**Dataset 2** |0.91 |0.83 |8.79 |30.03 |8.57 |71.46 |4911 |10207 |107.84 | | ||
|**Dataset 3** |0.94 |0.86 |8.51 |3.00 |0.86 |71.33 |6112 |11673 |90.98 | | ||
|**Dataset 4** |0.99 |0.98 |1.01 |0.62 |0.26 |58.06 |38273 |43267 |13.05 | | ||
|
||
### Query results | ||
|
||
|Dataset ID |Query clients |Faiss HNSW p90 (ms) |Faiss HNSW byte p90 (ms) |Faiss HNSW p99 (ms) |Faiss HNSW byte p99 (ms) | | ||
|--- |--- |--- |--- |--- |--- | | ||
|**Dataset 1** |**1** |5.35 |5.34 |5.95 |5.59 | | ||
|**Dataset 1** |**8** |6.68 |6.64 |10.23 |9.14 | | ||
|**Dataset 1** |**16** |10.59 |7.38 |12.94 |11.47 | | ||
| | | | | | | | ||
|**Dataset 2** |**1** |7.39 |7.14 |8.35 |7.59 | | ||
|**Dataset 2**|**8** |15.47 |14.83 |21.38 |16.20 | | ||
|**Dataset 2** |**16** |25.01 |25.32 |31.98 |29.42 | | ||
| | | | | | | | ||
|**Dataset 3** |**1** |4.97 |4.72 |5.62 |5.02 | | ||
|**Dataset 3** |**8** |6.75 |5.98 |7.69 |7.7 | | ||
|**Dataset 3** |**16** |10.51 |6.94 |13.87 |12.4 | | ||
| | | | | | | | ||
|**Dataset 4** |**1** |2.91 |3.03 |3.16 |3.15 | | ||
|**Dataset 4**|**8** |3.38 |3.30 |6.30 |4.75 | | ||
|**Dataset 4** |**16** |4.35 |3.80 |8.76 |8.83 | | ||
|
||
### Key findings | ||
|
||
The following are the key findings derived from comparing the benchmarking results: | ||
|
||
- **Memory savings**: Byte vectors reduced memory usage by up to **72%**, with higher-dimensional vectors achieving greater reductions. | ||
- **Indexing performance**: The mean indexing throughput for byte vectors was **2x to 107.84%** higher than for float vectors, especially with larger vector dimensions. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. "with larger vector dimensions" => "when using larger vector dimensions"? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think it's ok as is |
||
- **Search performance**: Search latencies were similar, with byte vectors occasionally performing better. | ||
- **Recall**: For byte vectors, there was a slight (up to **8.8%**) reduction in recall as compared to float vectors, depending on the dataset and the quantization technique used. | ||
|
||
## How does Faiss work with byte vectors internally? | ||
|
||
Faiss doesn't directly support the `byte` data type for vector storage. To achieve this, OpenSearch uses a [`QT_8bit_direct_signed` scalar quantizer](https://faiss.ai/cpp_api/struct/structfaiss_1_1ScalarQuantizer.html). This quantizer accepts float vectors within the signed 8-bit value range and encodes them as unsigned 8-bit integer vectors. During indexing and search, these encoded unsigned 8-bit integer vectors are decoded back into the original signed 8-bit vectors for distance computation. | ||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Line 160, end of last sentence: "are decoded back into the original signed 8-bit vectors for the purpose of distance computation"? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think it's understandable in the original form. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. It reads as though "the" should precede "signed", though. |
||
This quantization approach reduces the memory footprint by a factor of four. However, encoding and decoding during scalar quantization introduce additional latency. To mitigate this, you can use [SIMD optimization](https://opensearch.org/docs/latest/search-plugins/knn/knn-index#simd-optimization-for-the-faiss-engine) with the `QT_8bit_direct_signed` quantizer to reduce search latencies and improve indexing throughput. | ||
|
||
### Example | ||
|
||
The following example shows how an input vector is encoded and decoded using the `QT_8bit_direct_signed` scalar quantizer: | ||
|
||
```c | ||
// Input vector: | ||
[-126, 28, 127, 0, 10, -45, 12, -110] | ||
|
||
// Encoded vector generated by adding 128 to each dimension of the input vector to convert signed int8 to unsigned int8: | ||
[2, 156, 255, 128, 138, 83, 140, 18] | ||
|
||
// Encoded vector is decoded back into the original signed int8 vector by subtracting 128 from each dimension for distance computation: | ||
[-126, 28, 127, 0, 10, -45, 12, -110] | ||
``` | ||
|
||
## Future enhancements | ||
|
||
In future versions, we plan to enhance this feature by adding an `on_disk` mode with a `4x` Faiss compression level. This mode will accept `fp32` vectors as input, perform online training, and quantize the data into byte-sized vectors, eliminating the need to perform external quantization. | ||
|
||
## Conclusion | ||
|
||
OpenSearch 2.17 introduced support for Faiss byte vectors, allowing you to efficiently store quantized byte vector embeddings. This reduces memory consumption by up to 75%, lowers costs, and maintains high performance. These advantages make byte vectors an excellent choice for large-scale similarity search applications, especially when memory resources are limited, and applications that handle large volumes of data within the signed byte value range. | ||
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Line 185, first sentence: "compression level in Faiss" => "Faiss compression level"? |
||
## References | ||
|
||
* [Benchmarking datasets](https://github.com/erikbern/ann-benchmarks?tab=readme-ov-file#data-sets) | ||
* [Cohere/wikipedia-22-12-simple-embeddings](https://huggingface.co/datasets/Cohere/wikipedia-22-12-simple-embeddings) | ||
* Matthijs Douze, Alexandr Guzhva, Chengqi Deng, Jeff Johnson, Gergely Szilvasy, Pierre-Emmanuel Mazar’e, Maria Lomeli, Lucas Hosseini and Herv’e J’egou. The Faiss library. [https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.08281](https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.08281) | ||
Check failure on line 191 in _posts/2024-11-22-faiss-byte-vector.md GitHub Actions / style-job
Check failure on line 191 in _posts/2024-11-22-faiss-byte-vector.md GitHub Actions / style-job
Check failure on line 191 in _posts/2024-11-22-faiss-byte-vector.md GitHub Actions / style-job
Check failure on line 191 in _posts/2024-11-22-faiss-byte-vector.md GitHub Actions / style-job
Check failure on line 191 in _posts/2024-11-22-faiss-byte-vector.md GitHub Actions / style-job
Check failure on line 191 in _posts/2024-11-22-faiss-byte-vector.md GitHub Actions / style-job
Check failure on line 191 in _posts/2024-11-22-faiss-byte-vector.md GitHub Actions / style-job
Check failure on line 191 in _posts/2024-11-22-faiss-byte-vector.md GitHub Actions / style-job
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Line 92, first sentence: "precision in recall" => "recall precision"?