Skip to content

OSDOCS#15262: Update the z-stream RNs for 4.13.59 #96192

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: enterprise-4.13
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tmalove
Copy link
Contributor

@tmalove tmalove commented Jul 17, 2025

Version(s):
4.13

Issue:
OSDOCS-15262

Link to docs preview:
4.13.59

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.
    N/A for z-stream RNs

Additional information:
The errata URLs will return 404 until the go-live date of 7/17/25.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 17, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Jul 17, 2025

🤖 Thu Jul 17 17:59:18 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://96192--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-13-release-notes.html

@tmalove
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmalove commented Jul 17, 2025

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Jul 17, 2025
@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Jul 17, 2025
@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz added this to the Continuous Release milestone Jul 17, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

[id="ocp-4-13-59-bug-fixes_{context}"]
==== Bug fixes

* Before this update, an {product-title} upgrade bug from product version 4.12 to 4.13, caused network policies to incorrectly block traffic that was supposed to be allowed on the host network. Because of this bug, the pods on different nodes could not communicate with each other. With this release, during upgrades from 4.12 to 4.14, network policies work correctly, and pods communicate across different nodes. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-57051[OCPBUGS-57051])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* Before this update, an {product-title} upgrade bug from product version 4.12 to 4.13, caused network policies to incorrectly block traffic that was supposed to be allowed on the host network. Because of this bug, the pods on different nodes could not communicate with each other. With this release, during upgrades from 4.12 to 4.14, network policies work correctly, and pods communicate across different nodes. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-57051[OCPBUGS-57051])
* Before this update, an {product-title} upgrade bug from product version 4.12 to 4.13 caused network policies to incorrectly block traffic that was supposed to be allowed on the host network. Because of this bug, the pods on different nodes could not communicate with each other. With this release, during upgrades from 4.12 to 4.14, network policies work correctly, and pods communicate across different nodes. (link:https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-57051[OCPBUGS-57051])

comma splice but not a merge blocker; optional fix

@ShaunaDiaz ShaunaDiaz added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Jul 17, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 17, 2025

@tmalove: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@tmalove
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmalove commented Jul 17, 2025

/label merge-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Jul 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants