-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-45994: managed services: allow KubeDaemonSetMisScheduled alert #29357
Conversation
OSD-26887: managed services taints several nodes as infrastructure. This taint appears to be applied after some of the platform DS are scheduled there, causing this alert to fire. Managed services rebalances the DS after the taint is added, and the alert clears, but origin fails this test. Allowing this alert to fire while we investigate why the taint is not added at node birth.
@stbenjam: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-45994, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@stbenjam: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-45994, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jbpratt, stbenjam The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/cherry-pick release-4.18 |
@stbenjam: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/label acknowledge-critical-fixes-only |
/skip |
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial |
@stbenjam: Overrode contexts on behalf of stbenjam: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@stbenjam: Overrode contexts on behalf of stbenjam: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial |
@stbenjam: Overrode contexts on behalf of stbenjam: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/override ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn |
@stbenjam: Overrode contexts on behalf of stbenjam: ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/hold Revision 6c10437 was retested 3 times: holding |
/skip |
@stbenjam: Overrode contexts on behalf of stbenjam: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@stbenjam: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/hold cancel |
Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 6c10437
|
@stbenjam: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-45994: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-45994 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@stbenjam: new pull request created: #29366 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: openshift-enterprise-tests |
/cherry-pick release-4.18 |
@stbenjam: new pull request could not be created: failed to create pull request against openshift/origin#release-4.18 from head openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-29357-to-release-4.18: status code 422 not one of [201], body: {"message":"Validation Failed","errors":[{"resource":"PullRequest","code":"custom","message":"A pull request already exists for openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-29357-to-release-4.18."}],"documentation_url":"https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/pulls#create-a-pull-request","status":"422"} In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
OSD-26887: managed services taints several nodes as infrastructure. This taint appears to be applied after some of the platform DS are scheduled there, causing this alert to fire. Managed services rebalances the DS after the taint is added, and the alert clears, but origin fails this test. Allowing this alert to fire while we investigate why the taint is not added at node birth.