Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Per-role NeutronBridgeMappings - uni01alpha scenario #796

Conversation

hjensas
Copy link
Contributor

@hjensas hjensas commented Jan 30, 2025

Controllers, Computes and Networker nodes are not connected to the same physical networks in the uni01alpha scenario. Only controllers have the br-baremetal interface.

This change set's NeutronBridgeMappings per-role so that configuration on the nodes in different roles match the attached interfaces.

Copy link

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/524825d9988842028fd325b46e96abff

✔️ noop SUCCESS in 0s
adoption-standalone-to-crc-ceph FAILURE in 2h 54m 06s
adoption-standalone-to-crc-no-ceph FAILURE in 3h 02m 38s

@hjensas hjensas force-pushed the uni01alpha-bridge-mappings branch from 6cdcc68 to 45a8d3b Compare January 31, 2025 17:44
Controllers, Computes and Networker nodes are not connected to the same
physical networks in the uni01alpha scenario. Only controllers have
the `br-baremetal` interface.

This change set's NeutronBridgeMappings per-role so that configuration
on the nodes in different roles match the attached interfaces.
@hjensas hjensas force-pushed the uni01alpha-bridge-mappings branch from 45a8d3b to 14c351c Compare January 31, 2025 18:13
Copy link

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/c8d62f5a248a42b9b89c78769941e015

✔️ noop SUCCESS in 0s
✔️ adoption-standalone-to-crc-ceph SUCCESS in 2h 56m 01s
adoption-standalone-to-crc-no-ceph FAILURE in 1h 38m 38s

@hjensas
Copy link
Contributor Author

hjensas commented Feb 3, 2025

recheck

Copy link

Build failed (check pipeline). Post recheck (without leading slash)
to rerun all jobs. Make sure the failure cause has been resolved before
you rerun jobs.

https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/1d68b297909a40cdaa5a76515024d522

✔️ noop SUCCESS in 0s
✔️ adoption-standalone-to-crc-ceph SUCCESS in 2h 54m 28s
adoption-standalone-to-crc-no-ceph FAILURE in 2h 55m 14s

@hjensas hjensas force-pushed the uni01alpha-bridge-mappings branch from f8ea3b8 to 147dd88 Compare February 3, 2025 15:36
@jistr
Copy link
Contributor

jistr commented Feb 4, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Feb 4, 2025
@jistr jistr requested a review from ciecierski February 4, 2025 11:41
To align with the name used in ci-framework/architecture - rename
the bridge from "baremetal" to "ironic".
@hjensas hjensas force-pushed the uni01alpha-bridge-mappings branch from 147dd88 to 9a7f89c Compare February 4, 2025 21:12
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Feb 4, 2025
@jistr
Copy link
Contributor

jistr commented Feb 5, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Feb 5, 2025
@ciecierski
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 5, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ciecierski

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Feb 5, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit d2528a2 into openstack-k8s-operators:main Feb 5, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants