-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
Conversation
Zuul encountered a syntax error while parsing its configuration in the expected str for dictionary value @ data['github-check']['jobs'][1]['voting'] The error appears in the following project stanza: project: in "openstack-k8s-operators/dataplane-operator/zuul.d/projects.yaml@main", line 2, column 3 |
fc27198
to
f921520
Compare
Zuul encountered a syntax error while parsing its configuration in the 'str' object does not support item assignment The error appears in the following project stanza: project: in "openstack-k8s-operators/dataplane-operator/zuul.d/projects.yaml@main", line 2, column 3 |
f921520
to
d464917
Compare
Zuul encountered a syntax error while parsing its configuration in the extra keys not allowed @ data['github-check']['jobs'][1]['job']['name'] The error appears in the following project stanza: project: in "openstack-k8s-operators/dataplane-operator/zuul.d/projects.yaml@main", line 2, column 3 |
d464917
to
81cdb26
Compare
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/buildset/bf20720379fd45f9afcbf5f6a0470092 ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 13m 01s |
recheck - retry limit |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Even with the job as non-voting, I don't think this should be in github-check. My opinion is that I don't want this job running on every PR, it ought to be on demand triggered, or periodic.
Adoption process is going to be one of the first experiences our customers have with our new Openstack. Apart from obvious complexity involved, it's for this reason that we should expend effort to test this process soon, and often. The job does take time, but not substantially more than those we already have. The resources to run it are available, and even if it turned out to be unstable, which shouldn't happen, the non-voting nature will prevent it from blocking us. |
Agreed, but it doesn't need to be part of testing on all PRs.
We should be pushing more of our CI testing to be post-merge, not pre-merge. Are there specific gaps in kuttl or EnvTest that we can close that would provide similar benefit for pre-merge testing? Hypothetically we could cobble together something. But I would question a value of such a solution. It's easier to maintain 1 job then 2 jobs doing the same thing in a different way. And there is no guarantee it would be faster, or offer any tangible benefit over running it in RDO. |
81cdb26
to
034f373
Compare
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jpodivin The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: Jiri Podivin <[email protected]>
034f373
to
855073d
Compare
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/buildset/e1c81d8ce3e64321ba9f95b0327bd4b3 ✔️ openstack-k8s-operators-content-provider SUCCESS in 1h 30m 04s |
/retest-required |
No description provided.