Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update swiftproxy to use service override #49

Merged

Conversation

stuggi
Copy link
Contributor

@stuggi stuggi commented Sep 7, 2023

Removes creation of routes.Those get done in the openstack-operator. Via service overrides the service can be customized. The service operator adds annotation to the service which needs to be exposed as a route.

Jira: OSP-26690

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#332

@stuggi
Copy link
Contributor Author

stuggi commented Sep 7, 2023

/hold

@cschwede
Copy link
Collaborator

/retest

Removes creation of routes.Those get done in the openstack-operator.
Via service overrides the service can be customized. The service operator
adds annotation to the service which needs to be exposed as a route.

Jira: OSP-26690

Depends-On: openstack-k8s-operators/lib-common#332
Copy link
Contributor

@abays abays left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 20, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abays, stuggi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a37c476 into openstack-k8s-operators:main Sep 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants