feat: merge preview entry with index entry #581
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent update encompasses modifications to various packages, notably centered around simplifying the preview logic, altering HTML inclusions in the build config, and refining component imports within the Changes
Sequence DiagramssequenceDiagram
participant User
participant App
participant PreviewComponent
User->>App: Request URL
alt URL is "/preview"
App->>PreviewComponent: Call initPreview
PreviewComponent-->>App: Initialized Preview
else URL is not "/preview"
App->>PreviewComponent: Call initMain
PreviewComponent-->>App: Initialized Main
end
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/controller/js/preview.js (1)
Line range hint
31-31: Optimize the use of spread syntax in.reduceto improve performance.- params.scripts = scripts - .filter((item) => item.script) - .reduce((pre, cur) => ({ ...pre, [cur.package]: cur.script }), {}) + const scriptEntries = scripts.filter(item => item.script).map(item => [item.package, item.script]); + params.scripts = Object.fromEntries(scriptEntries);
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- designer-demo/index.html (1 hunks)
- packages/build/vite-config/src/default-config.js (2 hunks)
- packages/controller/js/preview.js (2 hunks)
- packages/design-core/index.js (1 hunks)
- packages/design-core/src/init.js (3 hunks)
- packages/design-core/src/preview/src/Toolbar.vue (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- designer-demo/index.html
- packages/design-core/index.js
Additional context used
Biome
packages/controller/js/preview.js
[error] 31-31: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators. (lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
Additional comments not posted (2)
packages/controller/js/preview.js (1)
39-43: Simplified URL construction logic enhances maintainability. Ensure that this change is tested across environments as the removed condition might affect behavior.packages/design-core/src/init.js (1)
25-25: Ensure the importedinitPreviewis used correctly and does not introduce side effects.Verification successful
The
initPreviewfunction is correctly imported and used in bothpackages/design-core/src/init.jsandpackages/engine-cli/template/designer/src/preview.js. The parameters passed toinitPreviewalign with its definition, ensuring proper usage without introducing side effects.
initPreviewis called withparamsinpackages/design-core/src/init.js.initPreviewis called with a specific object inpackages/engine-cli/template/designer/src/preview.js.- The function definition in
packages/design-core/src/preview/src/main.jscorrectly handles the parameters.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `initPreview` across the application. # Test: Search for all usages of `initPreview` to ensure it's being called appropriately. rg --type js $'initPreview'Length of output: 515
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the relevant lines where `initPreview` is called to review the parameters passed to it. # Extract the lines where `initPreview` is called in `packages/design-core/src/init.js` rg --type js --context 5 'initPreview' packages/design-core/src/init.js # Extract the lines where `initPreview` is called in `packages/engine-cli/template/designer/src/preview.js` rg --type js --context 5 'initPreview' packages/engine-cli/template/designer/src/preview.js # Extract the definition of `initPreview` in `packages/design-core/src/preview/src/main.js` rg --type js --context 10 'export const initPreview' packages/design-core/src/preview/src/main.jsLength of output: 1908
packages/controller/js/preview.js
Outdated
| @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ | |||
| */ | |||
|
|
|||
| import { constants } from '@opentiny/tiny-engine-utils' | |||
| import { isDevelopEnv } from './environments' | |||
| // import { isDevelopEnv } from './environments' | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider removing the commented-out import if isDevelopEnv is no longer needed.
- // import { isDevelopEnv } from './environments'Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // import { isDevelopEnv } from './environments' |
packages/design-core/src/init.js
Outdated
| export const init = (params) => { | ||
| const path = window.location.pathname | ||
|
|
||
| // 预览页面 | ||
| if (path.endsWith('/preview')) { | ||
| initPreview(params) | ||
| } else { | ||
| // 主设计器 | ||
| initMain(params) | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The previous commands did not yield any results indicating that there are no direct or indirect tests for the init function, initPreview, or initMain in the identified test files. This suggests that the new conditional initialization logic in the init function is not covered by existing tests.
To ensure comprehensive test coverage, tests should be added for the init function covering both conditions (/preview and the main path).
- Please add unit tests for the
initfunction in the appropriate test files. - Ensure the tests cover both scenarios: when the path ends with
/previewand when it doesn't.
Analysis chain
The new conditional initialization logic in init function is a good approach to handle different page types. Ensure comprehensive tests cover all conditions.
The previous commands successfully listed numerous test files but failed to find any mentions of the init function within those files. This suggests that there might be a lack of direct tests for the init function or the tests might be located in a different context.
To ensure comprehensive verification, let's broaden our search to include any test cases that might indirectly test the init function by looking for related terms such as initPreview and initMain.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the test coverage for the new conditional initialization logic.
# Test: Search for test files related to the `init` function.
rg --type js $'test.*init'
Length of output: 27
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Broaden the search to find any test files and then look for specific test cases related to the `init` function.
# Step 1: Search for all test files in the repository.
fd --type f --name '*test*.js'
# Step 2: Within those test files, search for any mentions of the `init` function.
fd --type f --name '*test*.js' --exec rg 'init'
Length of output: 582
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Correct the search command to find test files and then look for specific test cases related to the `init` function.
# Step 1: Search for all test files in the repository using the correct syntax.
fd 'test' --type f --extension js
# Step 2: Within those test files, search for any mentions of the `init` function.
fd 'test' --type f --extension js --exec rg 'init' {}
Length of output: 2752
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for test cases that might indirectly test the `init` function by looking for related terms.
# Step 1: Search for all test files in the repository using the correct syntax.
fd 'test' --type f --extension js
# Step 2: Within those test files, search for any mentions of the `initPreview` or `initMain` functions.
fd 'test' --type f --extension js --exec rg 'initPreview|initMain' {}
Length of output: 2770
| @@ -150,7 +149,7 @@ export default defineConfig(({ command = 'serve', mode = 'serve' }, extOptions) | |||
| }) | |||
| const htmlPlugin = (mode) => { | |||
| const upgradeHttpsMetaTags = [] | |||
| const includeHtmls = ['index.html', 'preview.html', 'previewApp.html'] | |||
| const includeHtmls = ['index.html'] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The output indicates that canvas.html and previewApp.html are actively referenced in the codebase, suggesting they might be important for the build process. On the other hand, tmp/report.html appears to be a temporary file and might not need inclusion in the includeHtmls array.
To ensure the build process includes all necessary HTML files, it's advisable to add canvas.html and previewApp.html to the includeHtmls array.
packages/build/vite-config/src/default-config.js:- Add
canvas.htmlandpreviewApp.htmltoincludeHtmls.
- Add
Analysis chain
The simplification of the includeHtmls array aligns with the PR's objective to consolidate entry points. Confirm that all necessary HTML files are included.
The includeHtmls array currently only includes index.html. However, the search results show other HTML files like canvas.html, previewApp.html, and tmp/report.html. It is important to verify if these files need to be included in the includeHtmls array for the build process.
tmp/report.html: This might be a temporary file and may not need inclusion.canvas.html: This is referenced inDesignCanvas.vue.previewApp.html: This is referenced inMain.vue.
To make a final decision, it's necessary to understand the role of these files in the build process.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all necessary HTML files are correctly included in builds.
# Test: Search for configurations that specify included HTML files.
rg --type js $'includeHtmls'
Length of output: 258
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for references to HTML files in the project to ensure no necessary files are omitted.
# Search for references to HTML files in the project.
rg --type js '\.html'
Length of output: 898
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Gather more context about the usage of the identified HTML files.
# Search for references to `canvas.html`.
rg --type js 'canvas.html'
# Search for references to `previewApp.html`.
rg --type js 'previewApp.html'
# Search for references to `tmp/report.html`.
rg --type js 'tmp/report.html'
Length of output: 467
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/controller/js/preview.js (1)
Line range hint
30-30: Optimize the accumulation inreduceto improve performance.- params.scripts = scripts - .filter((item) => item.script) - .reduce((pre, cur) => ({ ...pre, [cur.package]: cur.script }), {}) + params.scripts = scripts + .filter((item) => item.script) + .reduce((pre, cur) => { + pre[cur.package] = cur.script; + return pre; + }, {})
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/controller/js/preview.js (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Biome
packages/controller/js/preview.js
[error] 30-30: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators. (lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
Additional comments not posted (3)
packages/controller/js/preview.js (3)
38-38: Simplified URL construction logic looks good and aligns with PR objectives.
Line range hint
55-57: FunctionpreviewPagecorrectly sets the component type and uses theopenfunction efficiently.
Line range hint
59-61: FunctionpreviewBlockis implemented correctly, setting the component type and delegating to theopenfunction.
|
这个是有点反方向操作了感觉， preview应该是元应用 ，只是被单独渲染， 不应该和main启动器耦合， 应该往元应用（第一个单独被渲染的元应用）+ 提供一个元应用单独渲染器发展 |
This feels a bit like operating in the opposite direction. The preview should be a meta-application, which is only rendered separately. It should not be coupled with the main launcher. It should go to the meta-application (the first meta-application that is rendered independently) + provide a meta-application for independent rendering. device development |
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
index.html.Toolbar.vuefor more efficient usage.