Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: The style configuration binding variable component reads the configurator configuration #949

Merged

Conversation

yy-wow
Copy link
Collaborator

@yy-wow yy-wow commented Dec 21, 2024

English | 简体中文

PR

样式配置绑定变量组件读取configurator配置

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • Built its own designer, fully self-validated

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

Background and solution

样式配置绑定变量组件读取configurator配置

What is the current behavior?

样式配置绑定变量组件为固定组件

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

样式配置绑定变量组件读取configurator配置

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced dynamic rendering of configurator components for improved flexibility.
    • Added a new isCollapsed property to manage component state.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Streamlined import structure for configurator components.
  • Refactor
    • Updated component registration approach to utilize constants for configurator components.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the Main.vue component in the settings styles package, introducing a more dynamic approach to rendering configurator components. By utilizing the getConfigurator function from the meta-register package, the code now dynamically retrieves and renders CodeConfigurator and VariableConfigurator components. This change allows for more flexible component registration and usage within the Vue template, with the rendering conditional on the state.lineStyleDisable property.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/settings/styles/src/Main.vue - Updated import from direct component imports to getConfigurator function
- Dynamically retrieved CodeConfigurator and VariableConfigurator using getConfigurator
- Removed direct component references in components export
- Used dynamic <component :is> rendering for configurators
- Added isCollapsed property in the setup function and removed props declaration
packages/canvas/common/src/utils.js - Removed a semicolon from the end of a line in the dynamicImportComponents function

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • lichunn
  • hexqi

Poem

🐰 In Vue's dynamic dance, components sway
Configurators now leap in a nimble array
With getConfigurator's magical might
Rendering flexibly, pure delight!
Code transforms, rabbit hops with glee 🌈


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the refactor-main refactor/develop branch feature label Dec 21, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/settings/styles/src/Main.vue (1)

114-115: Consider adding error handling for configurator initialization.

While the implementation is correct, consider adding error handling for cases where getConfigurator fails to retrieve the components.

 setup(props) {
-    const CodeConfigurator = getConfigurator('CodeConfigurator')
-    const VariableConfigurator = getConfigurator('VariableConfigurator')
+    const CodeConfigurator = getConfigurator('CodeConfigurator') || null
+    const VariableConfigurator = getConfigurator('VariableConfigurator') || null
+    
+    if (!CodeConfigurator || !VariableConfigurator) {
+      console.warn('Failed to initialize configurator components')
+    }

Also applies to: 205-206

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7716dda and 3fcfde6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/settings/styles/src/Main.vue (6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/settings/styles/src/Main.vue (4)

20-27: LGTM! Consistent dynamic component implementation.

The VariableConfigurator's dynamic rendering implementation maintains all necessary bindings and event handlers while following the same pattern as CodeConfigurator.


105-105: LGTM! Component registration is properly updated.

The removal of static component registrations and addition of TinyInput is consistent with the dynamic component implementation.


72-72: Verify the getConfigurator function import.

The import change aligns with the dynamic component strategy.

Let's verify the function exists and its usage pattern:

✅ Verification successful

Import of getConfigurator is valid and properly used

The function is correctly exported from '@opentiny/tiny-engine-meta-register' package and is consistently used across the codebase:

  • Exported from packages/register/src/configurators.js
  • Re-exported in packages/register/src/index.js
  • Used consistently in multiple components to dynamically load configurators like 'CodeConfigurator', 'VariableConfigurator', and 'InputConfigurator'
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the getConfigurator export and its implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'export { $$$getConfigurator$$$ }'

# Check other usages of getConfigurator for consistency
rg "getConfigurator" -A 2

Length of output: 3057


Line range hint 6-16: LGTM! Dynamic component rendering implementation looks good.

The change from static to dynamic component rendering using :is directive is a good practice that aligns with the PR objectives of making the component more configurable.

Let's verify the dynamic component pattern usage across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

The previous ast-grep pattern might have failed due to syntax. Let's try using ripgrep to:

  1. Find dynamic component usage patterns in Vue files
  2. Understand how CodeConfigurator is used across the codebase

This will help us verify the consistency of the dynamic component implementation.


Let's try without the file type restriction and also check what file extensions are used in the project for Vue files. This will help us understand both the dynamic component usage pattern and the CodeConfigurator component's implementation.


Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response regarding the dynamic component implementation:

Dynamic component usage is consistent with codebase patterns

The search results show that the :is directive for dynamic components is widely used throughout the codebase, particularly in:

  • Layout components (packages/layout/src/*)
  • Plugin components (packages/plugins/*)
  • Common components (packages/common/component/*)

The CodeConfigurator component specifically appears in multiple configuration scenarios with similar prop patterns, confirming that the implementation in Main.vue follows established patterns.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar dynamic component patterns to ensure consistency
ast-grep --pattern 'component :is="$_" $$$'

Length of output: 45


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to search for dynamic component patterns
rg -U "(?s)<component[^>]+:is=\"[^\"]+\".*?</component>" --type vue

# Also search for the specific component name to understand its usage
rg "CodeConfigurator" --type vue -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 165


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for dynamic component patterns without file type restriction
rg -U "(?s)<component[^>]+:is=\"[^\"]+\".*?</component>"

# Search for CodeConfigurator usage
rg "CodeConfigurator" -A 2 -B 2

# List all Vue files to understand the file extension
fd "\.(vue|js|ts)$"

Length of output: 73422

@yy-wow yy-wow changed the title 样式配置绑定变量组件读取configurator配置 feat: The style configuration binding variable component reads the configurator configuration Jan 2, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 2, 2025
@hexqi hexqi added this to the v2.2.0 milestone Jan 13, 2025
hexqi
hexqi previously approved these changes Jan 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/settings/styles/src/Main.vue (2)

108-111: Document the purpose of isCollapsed prop.

The isCollapsed prop has been added but its purpose and usage aren't documented. Consider adding JSDoc comments to explain its functionality.


113-115: Document the architectural change to configurator-based components.

Based on the past review comments and PR objectives, please add comments explaining why we're switching to configurator-based component resolution. This will help future maintainers understand the architectural decision.

  setup(_props) {
+   // Using getConfigurator to dynamically resolve components, allowing them to read
+   // configurations from the configurator instead of using fixed components
    const CodeConfigurator = getConfigurator('CodeConfigurator')
    const VariableConfigurator = getConfigurator('VariableConfigurator')
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 113-113: 'props' is defined but never used. Allowed unused args must match /^_/u.

(no-unused-vars)

🪛 GitHub Check: push-check

[failure] 113-113:
'props' is defined but never used. Allowed unused args must match /^_/u

🪛 GitHub Actions: Push And Create PR Check

[error] 113-113: 'props' is defined but never used. Allowed unused args must match /^_/u (no-unused-vars)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3fcfde6 and 381d3fb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/settings/styles/src/Main.vue (5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
packages/settings/styles/src/Main.vue

[error] 113-113: 'props' is defined but never used. Allowed unused args must match /^_/u.

(no-unused-vars)

🪛 GitHub Check: push-check
packages/settings/styles/src/Main.vue

[failure] 113-113:
'props' is defined but never used. Allowed unused args must match /^_/u

🪛 GitHub Actions: Push And Create PR Check
packages/settings/styles/src/Main.vue

[error] 113-113: 'props' is defined but never used. Allowed unused args must match /^_/u (no-unused-vars)

🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/settings/styles/src/Main.vue (5)

Line range hint 6-16: LGTM: Dynamic component registration improves flexibility.

The switch to dynamic components using :is directive is a good architectural choice that allows for runtime component resolution while preserving the existing functionality.

Also applies to: 20-27


72-72: LGTM: Import changes align with configurator integration.

The switch to using getConfigurator from @opentiny/tiny-engine-meta-register aligns with the PR objective of reading configurations from the configurator.


105-105: LGTM: Component registration updated for dynamic components.

The removal of static component registrations is consistent with the switch to dynamic component resolution.


114-115: LGTM: Configurator initialization.

The initialization of configurator components using getConfigurator is implemented correctly.


217-218: LGTM: Return statement updated for dynamic components.

The addition of configurator components to the returned object is necessary for their use in the template.

packages/settings/styles/src/Main.vue Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/settings/styles/src/Main.vue (1)

20-27: Consider adding error handling for dynamic component loading

While the dynamic component implementation is correct, it would be beneficial to add error handling for cases where the configurator fails to load.

 <component
   :is="VariableConfigurator"
   ref="bindVariable"
   :model-value="state.bindModelValue"
   name="advance"
+  @error="handleConfiguratorError"
   @update:modelValue="setConfig"
 >
 </component>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 381d3fb and 5a8d372.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/canvas/common/src/utils.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/settings/styles/src/Main.vue (5 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • packages/canvas/common/src/utils.js
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: push-check
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/settings/styles/src/Main.vue (4)

Line range hint 6-16: LGTM: Dynamic component rendering for CodeConfigurator

The implementation correctly uses Vue's dynamic component feature with proper conditional rendering and event handling.


72-72: LGTM: Improved module imports and registration

The changes improve code modularity by:

  • Using the getConfigurator utility for dynamic component loading
  • Properly registering the TinyInput component

Also applies to: 105-105


108-109: LGTM: Proper configurator initialization

The configurators are correctly initialized using the getConfigurator utility.


211-212: Verify configurator registration in the meta-register package

Ensure that both 'CodeConfigurator' and 'VariableConfigurator' are properly registered in the meta-register package.

@yy-wow yy-wow changed the title feat: The style configuration binding variable component reads the configurator configuration fix: The style configuration binding variable component reads the configurator configuration Jan 14, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added bug Something isn't working and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Jan 14, 2025
@hexqi hexqi merged commit 3674f83 into opentiny:refactor/develop Jan 14, 2025
3 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 15, 2025
14 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working refactor-main refactor/develop branch feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants