test: add progress UI e2e test #57
Conversation
WalkthroughA new test suite for the "progress" component has been added in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
tests/progress/xdesign.spec.ts (4)
3-3: Consider using English for test descriptions.While the current description is clear for Chinese-speaking developers, using English for test descriptions can improve readability and maintainability for a wider audience in international projects.
Consider changing the test description to English, for example:
test.describe('Progress component xdesign specification', () => {
4-7: Good error handling, but consider improvements in naming and navigation.
- The error listener setup is a good practice for catching unexpected errors.
- Consider using English for the test title to improve readability for a wider audience.
- The navigation URL 'progress#basic-usage' might benefit from clarification or use of constants.
Consider these improvements:
Change the test title to English:
test('Default --UI screenshot', async ({ page }) => {Consider using a constant or configuration for the navigation URL:
const PROGRESS_BASIC_USAGE_URL = 'progress#basic-usage'; // ... await page.goto(PROGRESS_BASIC_USAGE_URL);This would make the test more maintainable if the URL structure changes in the future.
7-10: Good UI testing practices, with room for enhancement.The test correctly locates the demo element and performs appropriate checks:
- Verifying the element is in the viewport before screenshot comparison is a good practice.
- Using a specific ID for the locator enhances test stability.
- Screenshot comparison is an effective method for UI consistency testing.
Consider these enhancements for more robust UI testing:
Add a wait for network idle to ensure all resources are loaded:
await page.waitForLoadState('networkidle');Consider using a fuzzy matching option for screenshot comparison to handle minor rendering differences:
await expect(demo).toHaveScreenshot('basic-usage.png', { maxDiffPixels: 100 });Add multiple viewport sizes to test responsiveness:
test.describe.configure({ mode: 'parallel' }); for (const viewport of ['mobile', 'tablet', 'desktop']) { test(`Default --UI screenshot (${viewport})`, async ({ page }) => { // Set viewport size based on the device // ... (rest of the test code) }); }These suggestions can help make the test more resilient and comprehensive.
1-11: Overall, good implementation of e2e test with room for enhancements.This new test file successfully introduces an e2e test for the progress UI component, following many Playwright best practices. The structure is sound, and it achieves the goal of checking UI consistency.
To further improve the test:
- Consider using English for test descriptions and titles for better international collaboration.
- Enhance the robustness of the test with suggestions like waiting for network idle and using fuzzy matching for screenshots.
- Consider expanding the test to cover multiple viewport sizes for better responsiveness testing.
These enhancements will make the test more reliable, maintainable, and comprehensive.
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these suggestions or creating additional test cases for the progress component?
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
tests/progress/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/basic-usage-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
Files selected for processing (1)
- tests/progress/xdesign.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
tests/progress/xdesign.spec.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM: Correct imports for Playwright tests.The import statement correctly brings in the necessary functions from the Playwright test library.
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit