test(action-menu): Add test cases for the action-menu component #58
Conversation
WalkthroughA series of new test files for the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 16
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (30)
tests/action-menu/disabled.spec.ts (3)
1-3: Consider using English for test descriptions.While the current description is valid, using English for test suite descriptions can improve readability and collaboration in international teams.
Consider changing the test suite description to English:
-test.describe('action-menu 组件xdesign规范', () => { +test.describe('action-menu component xdesign specification', () => {
4-6: Improve test case title and URL structure.
- Consider using English for the test case title to improve readability for non-Chinese speakers.
- The URL structure
'action-menu#disabled'might be incomplete. Ensure this is the correct URL for your test environment.Consider applying these changes:
-test('禁用 --UI截图', async ({ page }) => { +test('Disabled state - UI screenshot', async ({ page }) => { page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) - await page.goto('action-menu#disabled') + await page.goto('/path/to/action-menu#disabled')Replace '/path/to/' with the correct base path for your test environment.
8-15: LGTM! Consider adding a visibility check.The element selections and initial assertions look good. The screenshot of the default state is a good practice for visual regression testing.
Consider adding a visibility check for the action menu before taking the screenshot:
await expect(demo).toBeInViewport() +await expect(actionMenu).toBeVisible() await expect(demo).toHaveScreenshot('default.png')tests/action-menu/text-field.spec.ts (2)
1-3: Consider using English for test descriptions.While the imports are correct, the test suite description is in Chinese. To improve readability and maintainability for a potentially diverse team, consider using English for test descriptions.
Here's a suggested change:
-test.describe('action-menu 组件xdesign规范', () => { +test.describe('action-menu component xdesign specification', () => {
1-25: Overall assessment: Good start, room for improvementThis test file provides a good foundation for testing the UI representation of the action-menu component. It covers both functional aspects (element visibility and interactions) and visual aspects (screenshot comparisons).
However, there are opportunities for improvement:
- Use English for test descriptions to improve readability for a diverse team.
- Implement more robust element selection using
data-testidattributes.- Replace fixed timeouts with Playwright's built-in waiting mechanisms.
- Consider adding more test cases to cover different scenarios and edge cases.
To enhance test coverage, consider adding the following test cases:
- Test different states of the action-menu (e.g., disabled, loading).
- Verify the correct display of menu items and submenus.
- Test keyboard navigation within the menu.
- Verify that clicking menu items triggers the expected actions.
- Test the component's responsiveness on different screen sizes.
These additional tests will help ensure the component behaves correctly across various scenarios and user interactions.
tests/action-menu/more-text.spec.ts (4)
1-3: Consider using English for the test suite description.The test suite description is currently in Chinese. For better maintainability and consistency across the project, especially if it's an international project, consider using English for all test descriptions.
Suggested change:
-test.describe('action-menu 组件xdesign规范', () => { +test.describe('action-menu component xdesign specification', () => {
4-6: Improve test case description and URL handling.
- Consider using English for the test case description for consistency and better maintainability.
- The URL used in
page.goto()is relative. It might be better to use a constant or configuration for the base URL to make the tests more maintainable.Suggested changes:
- test('自定义下拉文本 --UI截图', async ({ page }) => { + test('Custom dropdown text -- UI screenshot', async ({ page }) => { page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) - await page.goto('action-menu#more-text') + await page.goto(`${BASE_URL}/action-menu#more-text`)Consider defining
BASE_URLin a configuration file or as an environment variable.
8-15: Good initial setup, consider more robust selectors.The element selection and initial assertions look good. They cover the main components and ensure the demo is visible before proceeding.
Consider using more robust selectors instead of nth selectors where possible. For example:
- const menu = page.locator('body > .tiny-dropdown-menu').nth(0) + const menu = page.locator('body > .tiny-dropdown-menu[data-testid="action-menu-dropdown"]')This assumes you can add data-testid attributes to your components. If not, consider other unique attributes or class combinations to create more stable selectors.
17-24: Replace fixed timeouts with more reliable waiting mechanisms.The interaction simulation and final assertions are good, but using fixed timeouts can make tests flaky.
Consider replacing
page.waitForTimeout()with more reliable waiting mechanisms. For example:await dropdown.locator('.tiny-dropdown__suffix-inner').hover() - await page.waitForTimeout(100) + await page.waitForSelector('.tiny-dropdown-menu:visible') await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-item').nth(2).hover() - await page.waitForTimeout(100) + await page.waitForSelector('.tiny-dropdown-item:hover') await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-menu .tiny-dropdown-item').nth(1).hover() + await page.waitForSelector('.tiny-dropdown-menu .tiny-dropdown-item:hover') await expect(wrap).toHaveScreenshot('hover.png')This approach waits for specific state changes rather than arbitrary time periods, making the test more reliable and potentially faster.
tests/action-menu/basic-usage.spec.ts (2)
1-3: Consider translating the test suite description to English.The test suite description is currently in Chinese. For consistency and to improve readability for non-Chinese speaking developers, consider translating it to English.
Suggested change:
-test.describe('action-menu 组件xdesign规范', () => { +test.describe('action-menu component xdesign specification', () => {
8-15: Good element selection and initial assertions. Consider improving screenshot naming.The element selection using Playwright's locator API is well-done, and the initial assertions for viewport visibility and screenshot capture are good practices for UI testing.
Consider using a more specific name for the screenshot to avoid potential conflicts when more tests are added:
-await expect(demo).toHaveScreenshot('basic-usage.png') +await expect(demo).toHaveScreenshot('action-menu-basic-usage.png')tests/action-menu/card-mode.spec.ts (4)
1-3: Consider translating the test suite description to English.The test suite description is currently in Chinese. For better international collaboration and maintainability, it's recommended to use English for test descriptions.
Consider changing the test suite description to English:
-test.describe('action-menu 组件xdesign规范', () => { +test.describe('action-menu component xdesign specification', () => {
8-15: Use more specific screenshot names.The current screenshot name 'default.png' is generic and might lead to conflicts if more tests are added in the future.
Consider using a more specific name that includes the component and state being tested:
-await expect(demo).toHaveScreenshot('default.png') +await expect(demo).toHaveScreenshot('action-menu-card-mode-default.png')
23-25: Use a more specific name for the hover state screenshot.Similar to the earlier suggestion, the screenshot name 'hover.png' is too generic and might cause conflicts in the future.
Consider using a more specific name that includes the component and state being tested:
-await expect(wrap).toHaveScreenshot('hover.png') +await expect(wrap).toHaveScreenshot('action-menu-card-mode-hover.png')
1-25: Consider expanding test coverage.While this test covers basic functionality and appearance, consider adding:
- More specific assertions to verify element states or properties.
- Test cases for error scenarios or edge cases.
- Tests for different viewport sizes to ensure responsive behavior.
Here are some suggestions to improve test coverage:
Add assertions to verify specific element properties, e.g.:
await expect(dropdown).toBeVisible(); await expect(menu).toHaveClass(/your-expected-class/);Add test cases for error scenarios, e.g., what happens if the menu items fail to load?
Use Playwright's
page.setViewportSize()to test responsive behavior:test('Card mode responsive behavior', async ({ page }) => { await page.setViewportSize({ width: 1920, height: 1080 }); // Test for desktop view await page.setViewportSize({ width: 375, height: 667 }); // Test for mobile view });These additions will significantly improve the robustness of your test suite.
tests/action-menu/slot-item.spec.ts (2)
1-3: Consider using English for the test suite description.The test suite description is currently in Chinese. For better maintainability and consistency across the project, consider using English for all code and comments.
Suggested change:
-test.describe('action-menu 组件xdesign规范', () => { +test.describe('action-menu component xdesign specification', () => {
4-15: Use English for the test case title and LGTM for initial setup.The test case title is currently in Chinese. For consistency, consider using English. The initial setup, including error handling, navigation, element selection, and initial assertions, looks good.
Suggested change for the test case title:
-test('item插槽 --UI截图', async ({ page }) => { +test('item slot -- UI screenshot', async ({ page }) => {tests/action-menu/max-show-num.spec.ts (2)
1-4: Consider translating the test description to English.The test description is currently in Chinese. For better international collaboration and maintainability, consider translating it to English.
Here's a suggested translation:
-test.describe('action-menu 组件xdesign规范', () => { - test('个数限制 --UI截图', async ({ page }) => { +test.describe('action-menu component xdesign specification', () => { + test('Item limit - UI screenshot', async ({ page }) => {
5-12: LGTM! Consider simplifying locators.The test setup and navigation look good. The error listener is a great practice for catching unexpected issues.
Consider simplifying the locators that use
nth(0)if there's only one element expected:-const dropdown = actionMenu.nth(0).locator('.tiny-dropdown') +const dropdown = actionMenu.locator('.tiny-dropdown') -const menu = page.locator('body > .tiny-dropdown-menu').nth(0) +const menu = page.locator('body > .tiny-dropdown-menu')tests/action-menu/popper-class.spec.ts (2)
1-3: Consider using English for test descriptions.While the current description is clear, using English for test descriptions can improve readability and maintainability for a diverse development team. This practice ensures that all team members, regardless of their native language, can understand and contribute to the test suite.
Consider changing the test description to English:
-test.describe('action-menu 组件xdesign规范', () => { +test.describe('action-menu component xdesign specification', () => {
4-15: Approve setup and initial assertions, suggest English test title.The test setup and initial assertions are well-structured and comprehensive. Good job on including error handling and baseline screenshot comparison.
Consider translating the test title to English for consistency and improved readability:
-test('弹框样式 --UI截图', async ({ page }) => { +test('Popup style --UI screenshot', async ({ page }) => {tests/action-menu/spacing.spec.ts (4)
3-3: Consider using English for test descriptions.While the current title '
action-menu 组件xdesign规范' is descriptive, using English for test descriptions can improve readability and collaboration for international teams. Consider translating this to something like 'action-menu component xdesign specifications'.
4-24: Approve test structure with a suggestion for timeout duration.The test case for default spacing is well-structured, including error handling, navigation, hover actions, and screenshot captures. This comprehensive approach is commendable for UI testing.
However, consider increasing the timeout duration in the following lines:
await page.waitForTimeout(100)A timeout of 100ms might be too short for some environments or slower machines. Consider increasing it to at least 500ms to ensure stability across different execution environments.
26-43: Approve test structure with a suggestion for test name translation.The test case for custom spacing follows a consistent structure with the first test, which is excellent for maintainability. The use of a longer timeout (1000ms) is appropriate and addresses potential stability issues.
Consider translating the test case name to English for better international collaboration:
test('Custom spacing -- UI screenshot', async ({ page }) => { // ... (rest of the test case) })
1-44: Well-structured UI tests with room for expansion.Overall, these Playwright tests for the action-menu component are well-structured and follow good practices for UI testing. The use of screenshots for visual regression testing is appropriate, and the consistency between test cases enhances maintainability.
To further improve the test suite:
Consider adding more diverse test scenarios, such as:
- Testing with different viewport sizes to ensure responsiveness.
- Checking accessibility features of the action-menu.
- Verifying keyboard navigation within the menu.
Add comments explaining the purpose of specific actions or assertions to improve readability and maintainability.
Consider parameterizing the tests to reduce duplication between the default and custom spacing scenarios.
These additions would make the test suite more comprehensive and robust.
tests/action-menu/icon.spec.ts (5)
3-3: Consider using English for test descriptions.The overall test structure is good, grouping related tests within a describe block. However, for better international collaboration, consider using English for test descriptions.
Consider changing the test description to English:
-test.describe('action-menu 组件xdesign规范', () => { +test.describe('action-menu component xdesign specification', () => {
4-24: Replace waitForTimeout() with waitForSelector() for more reliable tests.The test case effectively covers important UI scenarios for the custom icon feature. However, using
waitForTimeout()can lead to flaky tests.Consider replacing
waitForTimeout()withwaitForSelector()orwaitForLoadState()for more reliable tests. For example:- await page.waitForTimeout(100) + await page.waitForSelector('.tiny-dropdown-menu .tiny-dropdown-item:hover', { state: 'attached' })This change will make the tests more robust and less dependent on arbitrary timing.
26-43: Extract common setup code and replace waitForTimeout().This test case effectively covers the blue custom icon scenario. However, there's code duplication with the previous test, and the use of
waitForTimeout()persists.Consider the following improvements:
- Extract common setup code into a separate function or use
test.beforeEach().- Replace
waitForTimeout()withwaitForSelector()as suggested in the previous comment.- Use English for test descriptions.
Example refactoring:
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => { page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) await page.goto('action-menu#icon') }) test('Custom icon (blue) - UI screenshot', async ({ page }) => { // ... (rest of the test code) await page.waitForSelector('.tiny-dropdown-menu .tiny-dropdown-item:hover', { state: 'attached' }) // ... })This will reduce code duplication and improve test reliability.
45-62: Refactor common code and improve wait mechanism.This test case effectively covers the text-only display scenario. However, it shares the same issues with
waitForTimeout()and code duplication as the previous tests.Apply the same improvements suggested for the previous tests:
- Extract common setup code.
- Replace
waitForTimeout()withwaitForSelector().- Use English for test descriptions.
Additionally, note the different selector used for the dropdown trigger:
- await dropdown.locator('.tiny-dropdown__suffix-inner').hover() + await dropdown.locator('.tiny-dropdown__trigger').hover()Ensure this difference is intentional and reflects the actual component behavior for the text-only display.
1-63: Improve overall test structure and maintainability.The tests effectively cover different UI scenarios for the action-menu component, which is excellent for visual regression testing. However, there are opportunities to improve the overall structure and maintainability of the test suite.
Consider the following improvements:
- Extract common setup code into a
test.beforeEach()hook or a utility function.- Create a helper function for the common hover and screenshot capture logic.
- Use parameterized tests to reduce code duplication across similar test cases.
- Consistently use English for test descriptions and comments.
Example refactoring:
test.describe('Action Menu Component UI Tests', () => { test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => { page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) await page.goto('action-menu#icon') }) const testCases = [ { name: 'Custom icon', index: 0, triggerSelector: '.tiny-dropdown__suffix-inner', screenshotName: 'default' }, { name: 'Custom icon (blue)', index: 1, triggerSelector: '.tiny-dropdown__suffix-inner', screenshotName: 'icon-hover' }, { name: 'Text only', index: 2, triggerSelector: '.tiny-dropdown__trigger', screenshotName: 'text' } ] for (const { name, index, triggerSelector, screenshotName } of testCases) { test(`${name} - UI screenshot`, async ({ page }) => { const demo = page.locator('#icon .pc-demo') const actionMenu = demo.locator('.tiny-action-menu') const dropdown = actionMenu.nth(index).locator('.tiny-dropdown') const wrap = page.locator('.docs-tabs-wrap') const menu = page.locator('body > .tiny-dropdown-menu').nth(0) await dropdown.locator(triggerSelector).hover() await page.waitForSelector('.tiny-dropdown-menu .tiny-dropdown-item:hover', { state: 'attached' }) await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-item').nth(1).hover() await page.waitForSelector('.tiny-dropdown-menu .tiny-dropdown-item:hover', { state: 'attached' }) await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-menu .tiny-dropdown-item').nth(1).hover() await expect(wrap).toHaveScreenshot(`${screenshotName}.png`) }) } })This refactoring will significantly reduce code duplication, improve maintainability, and make it easier to add new test cases in the future.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (24)
tests/action-menu/basic-usage.spec.ts-snapshots/basic-usage-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/basic-usage.spec.ts-snapshots/hover-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/card-mode.spec.ts-snapshots/default-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/card-mode.spec.ts-snapshots/hover-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/disabled.spec.ts-snapshots/default-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/disabled.spec.ts-snapshots/hover-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/events.spec.ts-snapshots/events-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/icon.spec.ts-snapshots/default-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/icon.spec.ts-snapshots/hover-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/icon.spec.ts-snapshots/icon-hover-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/icon.spec.ts-snapshots/text-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/max-show-num.spec.ts-snapshots/default-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/max-show-num.spec.ts-snapshots/hover-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/more-text.spec.ts-snapshots/default-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/more-text.spec.ts-snapshots/hover-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/popper-class.spec.ts-snapshots/default-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/popper-class.spec.ts-snapshots/hover-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/slot-item.spec.ts-snapshots/default-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/slot-item.spec.ts-snapshots/hover-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/spacing.spec.ts-snapshots/default-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/spacing.spec.ts-snapshots/hover-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/spacing.spec.ts-snapshots/spacing-hover-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/text-field.spec.ts-snapshots/default-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngtests/action-menu/text-field.spec.ts-snapshots/hover-chromium-win32.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
Files selected for processing (11)
- tests/action-menu/basic-usage.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/action-menu/card-mode.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/action-menu/disabled.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/action-menu/events.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/action-menu/icon.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/action-menu/max-show-num.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/action-menu/more-text.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/action-menu/popper-class.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/action-menu/slot-item.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/action-menu/spacing.spec.ts (1 hunks)
- tests/action-menu/text-field.spec.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (7)
tests/action-menu/disabled.spec.ts (1)
1-25: Overall good test implementation with room for improvement.This test case for the disabled state of the action-menu component is well-structured and covers both default and hover states. The use of screenshots for visual regression testing is commendable. To further improve the test:
- Use English for test descriptions and titles for better international collaboration.
- Replace fixed timeouts with Playwright's built-in waiting mechanisms for improved reliability.
- Add visibility checks before taking screenshots to ensure consistent results.
- Verify the URL structure used in the
page.goto()call.These improvements will enhance the test's reliability and maintainability.
tests/action-menu/more-text.spec.ts (1)
1-25: Overall, good test implementation with room for improvement.This test case for the action-menu component is well-structured and covers important aspects of UI validation and interaction simulation. Here's a summary of the main points for improvement:
- Use English for test suite and test case descriptions for better maintainability.
- Consider using a constant or configuration for the base URL in
page.goto().- Use more robust selectors instead of nth selectors where possible.
- Replace fixed timeouts with more reliable waiting mechanisms.
Implementing these suggestions will enhance the test's reliability, maintainability, and adherence to best practices.
tests/action-menu/basic-usage.spec.ts (1)
4-6: Translate test case title and clarify URL structure.
- The test case title is in Chinese. Consider translating it to English for consistency.
- The URL structure 'action-menu#basic-usage' is used. Please clarify if this is a relative path or if there's a base URL that should be used.
Suggested change for the title:
-test('默认--UI截图', async ({ page }) => { +test('Default--UI screenshot', async ({ page }) => {To verify the URL structure, please run the following script:
tests/action-menu/card-mode.spec.ts (1)
4-7: Translate test case description and clarify URL structure.
- The test case description is in Chinese. Consider translating it to English for better international collaboration.
- The URL structure
'action-menu#card-mode'is not clear without more context. Is this a relative path within your application, or should it be a full URL?Consider changing the test case description to English:
-test('卡片模式 --UI截图', async ({ page }) => { +test('Card mode -- UI screenshot', async ({ page }) => {To clarify the URL structure, please run the following script:
This will help us understand if there's a base URL configured for the tests.
Verification successful
Translate test case description for better clarity.
- The test case description is in Chinese. Consider translating it to English for better international collaboration.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for the base URL configuration in the project # Test: Search for base URL configuration in playwright config rg --type typescript 'baseURL' -A 5 playwright.config.tsLength of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for the base URL configuration in the project # Test: Search for base URL configuration in playwright config rg --type ts 'baseURL' -A 5 playwright.config.tsLength of output: 372
tests/action-menu/slot-item.spec.ts (1)
23-25: LGTM for final assertion and overall test structure.The final screenshot assertion and the overall structure of the test case look good. It effectively captures the UI state after user interactions.
tests/action-menu/spacing.spec.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM: Imports are correct and necessary.The import statement is appropriate for Playwright tests, importing only the necessary functions.
tests/action-menu/icon.spec.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM: Imports are correct and necessary.The import statement is appropriate for Playwright tests, importing only the necessary functions.
| await dropdown.locator('.tiny-dropdown__suffix-inner ').hover() | ||
| await page.waitForTimeout(100) | ||
| await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-item').nth(2).hover() | ||
| await page.waitForTimeout(100) | ||
| await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-menu .tiny-dropdown-item').nth(1).hover() | ||
|
|
||
| await expect(wrap).toHaveScreenshot('hover.png') | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve test reliability by replacing fixed timeouts.
The hover interactions and final screenshot are good for testing the disabled state. However, using fixed timeouts can lead to flaky tests.
Consider replacing the fixed timeouts with Playwright's built-in waiting mechanisms:
await dropdown.locator('.tiny-dropdown__suffix-inner ').hover()
-await page.waitForTimeout(100)
+await page.waitForSelector('.tiny-dropdown-menu', { state: 'visible' })
await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-item').nth(2).hover()
-await page.waitForTimeout(100)
+await page.waitForSelector('.tiny-dropdown-item:hover')
await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-menu .tiny-dropdown-item').nth(1).hover()
+await page.waitForSelector('.tiny-dropdown-menu .tiny-dropdown-item:hover')
await expect(wrap).toHaveScreenshot('hover.png')These changes will make the test more reliable by waiting for specific conditions rather than arbitrary timeouts.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| await dropdown.locator('.tiny-dropdown__suffix-inner ').hover() | |
| await page.waitForTimeout(100) | |
| await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-item').nth(2).hover() | |
| await page.waitForTimeout(100) | |
| await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-menu .tiny-dropdown-item').nth(1).hover() | |
| await expect(wrap).toHaveScreenshot('hover.png') | |
| }) | |
| await dropdown.locator('.tiny-dropdown__suffix-inner ').hover() | |
| await page.waitForSelector('.tiny-dropdown-menu', { state: 'visible' }) | |
| await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-item').nth(2).hover() | |
| await page.waitForSelector('.tiny-dropdown-item:hover') | |
| await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-menu .tiny-dropdown-item').nth(1).hover() | |
| await page.waitForSelector('.tiny-dropdown-menu .tiny-dropdown-item:hover') | |
| await expect(wrap).toHaveScreenshot('hover.png') | |
| }) |
| test('字段映射 --UI截图', async ({ page }) => { | ||
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) | ||
| await page.goto('action-menu#text-field') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve test case description and URL handling.
- Consider using English for the test case description to improve readability.
- The URL used in
page.goto()is a relative path. It's recommended to use a base URL configuration in your Playwright setup for better maintainability.
Here's a suggested change for the test case description:
-test('字段映射 --UI截图', async ({ page }) => {
+test('Field mapping - UI screenshot', async ({ page }) => {For the URL, consider using a base URL configuration:
// In your playwright.config.ts
use: {
baseURL: 'http://your-base-url.com/',
}
// Then in your test
await page.goto('/action-menu#text-field')| const demo = page.locator('#text-field .pc-demo') | ||
| const actionMenu = demo.locator('.tiny-action-menu') | ||
| const dropdown = actionMenu.locator('.tiny-dropdown') | ||
| const wrap = page.locator('.docs-tabs-wrap') | ||
| const menu = page.locator('body > .tiny-dropdown-menu').nth(0) | ||
|
|
||
| await expect(demo).toBeInViewport() | ||
| await expect(demo).toHaveScreenshot('default.png') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance element selection robustness.
The current element selection uses class names and IDs, which might be brittle if the UI structure changes. Consider using data-testid attributes for more robust element selection.
Here's an example of how you could refactor some of the selectors:
const demo = page.locator('[data-testid="text-field-demo"]')
const actionMenu = demo.locator('[data-testid="action-menu"]')
const dropdown = actionMenu.locator('[data-testid="dropdown"]')Then update your HTML to include these attributes:
<div id="text-field" class="pc-demo" data-testid="text-field-demo">
<div class="tiny-action-menu" data-testid="action-menu">
<div class="tiny-dropdown" data-testid="dropdown">
<!-- ... -->
</div>
</div>
</div>This approach makes your tests less dependent on the specific structure and styling of your components.
| await dropdown.locator('.tiny-dropdown__suffix-inner').hover() | ||
| await page.waitForTimeout(100) | ||
| await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-item').nth(2).hover() | ||
| await page.waitForTimeout(100) | ||
| await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-menu .tiny-dropdown-item').nth(1).hover() | ||
|
|
||
| await expect(wrap).toHaveScreenshot('hover.png') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace fixed timeouts with Playwright's waiting mechanisms.
Using fixed timeouts (page.waitForTimeout(100)) can lead to flaky tests. Playwright provides built-in waiting mechanisms that are more reliable.
Consider replacing the timeouts with Playwright's waitFor methods. Here's an example of how you could refactor this section:
await dropdown.locator('.tiny-dropdown__suffix-inner').hover()
await menu.waitForSelector('.tiny-dropdown-item:nth-child(3)')
await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-item').nth(2).hover()
await menu.waitForSelector('.tiny-dropdown-menu .tiny-dropdown-item:nth-child(2)')
await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-menu .tiny-dropdown-item').nth(1).hover()This approach ensures that the test waits for elements to be available before interacting with them, making the test more robust and less likely to fail due to timing issues.
| await expect(wrap).toHaveScreenshot('hover.png') | ||
| }) | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve final screenshot naming and consider additional assertions.
Capturing the final state is good practice. However, consider the following improvements:
- Use a more specific name for the final screenshot.
- Add assertions to verify the state of the menu after interactions.
Suggested change for screenshot naming:
-await expect(wrap).toHaveScreenshot('hover.png')
+await expect(wrap).toHaveScreenshot('action-menu-hover-state.png')Consider adding assertions to verify the menu state, for example:
await expect(menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-item').nth(0)).toHaveClass(/hover/);| import { expect, test } from '@playwright/test' | ||
|
|
||
| test.describe('action-menu 组件xdesign规范', () => { | ||
| test('弹框样式 --UI截图', async ({ page }) => { | ||
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) | ||
| await page.goto('action-menu#popper-class') | ||
|
|
||
| const demo = page.locator('#popper-class .pc-demo') | ||
| const actionMenu = demo.locator('.tiny-action-menu') | ||
| const dropdown = actionMenu.nth(0).locator('.tiny-dropdown') | ||
| const wrap = page.locator('.docs-tabs-wrap') | ||
| const menu = page.locator('body > .tiny-dropdown-menu').nth(0) | ||
|
|
||
| await expect(demo).toBeInViewport() | ||
| await expect(demo).toHaveScreenshot('default.png') | ||
|
|
||
| await dropdown.locator('.tiny-dropdown__suffix-inner').hover() | ||
| await page.waitForTimeout(100) | ||
| await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-item').nth(2).hover() | ||
| await page.waitForTimeout(100) | ||
| await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-menu .tiny-dropdown-item').nth(0).hover() | ||
|
|
||
| await expect(wrap).toHaveScreenshot('hover.png') | ||
| }) | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Suggest additional test cases for improved coverage.
The current test case provides good coverage for the basic functionality of the action-menu component. To further improve the test suite, consider adding the following test cases:
- Test keyboard navigation through the menu items.
- Verify that the menu closes when clicking outside of it.
- Check if the menu items are correctly disabled when applicable.
- Test the behavior of nested menu items, if supported.
- Verify the correct application of the
popper-classconfiguration.
These additional test cases will help ensure the component behaves correctly in various scenarios and improve overall test coverage.
| import { expect, test } from '@playwright/test' | ||
|
|
||
| test.describe('action-menu 组件xdesign规范', () => { | ||
| test('事件 --UI截图', async ({ page }) => { | ||
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) | ||
| await page.goto('action-menu#events') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling and navigation setup.
The test setup is good, but consider the following improvements:
- Use
test.beforeEach()for common setup steps like navigation and error handling. - Consider using a more descriptive error message for the
pageerrorhandler. - Use a constant for the base URL to make it easier to maintain and update.
Here's a suggested refactor:
import { expect, test } from '@playwright/test'
const BASE_URL = 'http://your-base-url.com/'
test.describe('action-menu 组件xdesign规范', () => {
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {
page.on('pageerror', (error) => {
console.error(`Page error: ${error.message}`)
expect(error).toBeNull()
})
await page.goto(`${BASE_URL}action-menu#events`)
})
test('事件 --UI截图', async ({ page }) => {
// Test code here
})
})This refactoring improves maintainability and provides more informative error messages.
| const demo = page.locator('#events .pc-demo') | ||
| const body = page.locator('body') | ||
| const actionMenu = demo.locator('.tiny-action-menu') | ||
| const dropdown = actionMenu.nth(0).locator('.tiny-dropdown') | ||
| const wrap = page.locator('.docs-tabs-wrap') | ||
| const menu = page.locator('body > .tiny-dropdown-menu').nth(0) | ||
|
|
||
| await dropdown.locator('.tiny-dropdown__suffix-inner').click() | ||
| await page.waitForTimeout(100) | ||
| await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-item').nth(2).hover() | ||
| await page.waitForTimeout(100) | ||
| await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-menu .tiny-dropdown-item').nth(0).click() | ||
| await page.waitForTimeout(100) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve element selection and interaction readability.
The element selection and interaction steps are correct, but we can enhance readability and maintainability:
- Use descriptive constants for locators to improve readability.
- Consider creating helper functions for common interactions.
- Use Playwright's built-in waiting mechanisms instead of arbitrary timeouts.
Here's a suggested refactor:
const SELECTORS = {
demo: '#events .pc-demo',
actionMenu: '.tiny-action-menu',
dropdown: '.tiny-dropdown',
dropdownSuffix: '.tiny-dropdown__suffix-inner',
dropdownMenu: 'body > .tiny-dropdown-menu',
dropdownItem: '.tiny-dropdown-item'
}
const clickAndWait = async (page, selector) => {
await page.click(selector)
await page.waitForChanges()
}
test('事件 --UI截图', async ({ page }) => {
const demo = page.locator(SELECTORS.demo)
const actionMenu = demo.locator(SELECTORS.actionMenu)
const dropdown = actionMenu.first().locator(SELECTORS.dropdown)
const menu = page.locator(SELECTORS.dropdownMenu).first()
await clickAndWait(page, `${SELECTORS.dropdown} ${SELECTORS.dropdownSuffix}`)
await menu.locator(SELECTORS.dropdownItem).nth(2).hover()
await clickAndWait(page, `${SELECTORS.dropdownMenu} ${SELECTORS.dropdownItem}`)
// Rest of the test...
})This refactoring improves readability, maintainability, and removes arbitrary timeouts.
| await expect(body).toBeInViewport() | ||
| await expect(body).toHaveScreenshot('events.png') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance assertions and screenshot capture.
The current assertions and screenshot capture are good, but consider the following improvements:
- Add more specific assertions to verify the action-menu behavior.
- Use a more descriptive name for the screenshot.
- Consider capturing a screenshot of the specific component instead of the entire body.
Here's a suggested refactor:
// Add these assertions before capturing the screenshot
await expect(menu).toBeVisible()
await expect(menu.locator(SELECTORS.dropdownItem).first()).toHaveClass(/is-active/)
// Capture a screenshot of the specific component
await expect(actionMenu).toHaveScreenshot('action-menu-after-interaction.png')These changes will make the test more robust and focused on the action-menu component.
| test.describe('action-menu 组件xdesign规范', () => { | ||
| test('事件 --UI截图', async ({ page }) => { | ||
| page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull()) | ||
| await page.goto('action-menu#events') | ||
|
|
||
| const demo = page.locator('#events .pc-demo') | ||
| const body = page.locator('body') | ||
| const actionMenu = demo.locator('.tiny-action-menu') | ||
| const dropdown = actionMenu.nth(0).locator('.tiny-dropdown') | ||
| const wrap = page.locator('.docs-tabs-wrap') | ||
| const menu = page.locator('body > .tiny-dropdown-menu').nth(0) | ||
|
|
||
| await dropdown.locator('.tiny-dropdown__suffix-inner').click() | ||
| await page.waitForTimeout(100) | ||
| await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-item').nth(2).hover() | ||
| await page.waitForTimeout(100) | ||
| await menu.locator('.tiny-dropdown-menu .tiny-dropdown-item').nth(0).click() | ||
| await page.waitForTimeout(100) | ||
|
|
||
| await expect(body).toBeInViewport() | ||
| await expect(body).toHaveScreenshot('events.png') | ||
| }) | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Expand test coverage and improve test structure.
The current test provides a good starting point, but consider the following improvements to enhance overall test coverage and structure:
- Add more test cases to cover different scenarios and edge cases.
- Separate UI tests from functional tests.
- Use
test.describe.parallel()for better test execution performance. - Add accessibility tests using Playwright's built-in accessibility testing features.
Here's a suggested structure for improved test coverage:
import { expect, test } from '@playwright/test'
test.describe.parallel('Action Menu Component', () => {
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {
// Common setup code
})
test.describe('UI Tests', () => {
test('renders correctly and captures screenshot', async ({ page }) => {
// Existing test code
})
test('displays correct styles on hover and focus', async ({ page }) => {
// New test for styling
})
})
test.describe('Functional Tests', () => {
test('opens dropdown on click', async ({ page }) => {
// Test dropdown opening
})
test('selects item correctly', async ({ page }) => {
// Test item selection
})
test('handles keyboard navigation', async ({ page }) => {
// Test keyboard accessibility
})
})
test.describe('Accessibility Tests', () => {
test('meets accessibility standards', async ({ page }) => {
// Use Playwright's accessibility testing features
const accessibilityReport = await page.accessibility.snapshot()
expect(accessibilityReport).toHaveNoViolations()
})
})
})This structure provides a more comprehensive test suite for the action-menu component, covering various aspects of its functionality and accessibility.
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
action-menucomponent, validating various aspects such as basic usage, card mode, disabled state, events, icon behavior, and spacing.Bug Fixes