Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(e2e): add breadcrumb UI e2e test #71

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2024
Merged

test(e2e): add breadcrumb UI e2e test #71

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2024

Conversation

zzcr
Copy link
Member

@zzcr zzcr commented Sep 29, 2024

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Introduced a new test suite for the breadcrumb component, validating UI functionality with two test cases.
    • Tests include capturing screenshots for default and custom separator states, ensuring component visibility and error handling.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 29, 2024

Walkthrough

A new test suite has been added for the breadcrumb component, located in tests/breadcrumb/xdesign.spec.ts. This suite includes two test cases that validate the component's UI functionality, including default and custom separator scenarios. Each test case captures screenshots of the component in different states and ensures that it remains visible in the viewport during interactions.

Changes

File Change Summary
tests/breadcrumb/xdesign.spec.ts Introduced a new test suite for the breadcrumb component with two test cases validating UI functionality and capturing screenshots.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

e2e

🐇 In the meadow where breadcrumbs lay,
New tests hop in to play each day.
With screenshots bright, they check the view,
Ensuring each path is clear and true.
A dance of pixels, a joyful sight,
For every click brings delight! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the e2e playwright label Sep 29, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
tests/breadcrumb/xdesign.spec.ts (3)

1-3: Consider using English for test suite names.

The test suite name is currently in Chinese. For better consistency and easier collaboration, especially in international teams, consider using English for test suite names.

Suggested change:

-test.describe('breadcrumb组件xdesign规范', () => {
+test.describe('Breadcrumb component xdesign specification', () => {

4-15: Approve test case with minor improvement suggestion.

The test case effectively covers the default UI state and hover interaction. The use of screenshots for UI testing and the implementation of error handling are good practices.

For improved readability, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of each screenshot:

 await expect(demo).toBeInViewport()
+// Capture the default state of the breadcrumb
 await expect(demo).toHaveScreenshot('base.png')

 // 关闭按钮hover状态
 await demo.getByText('产品').hover()
 await expect(demo).toBeInViewport()
+// Capture the hover state of the '产品' (Product) button
 await expect(demo).toHaveScreenshot('hover.png')

17-23: Approve test case with suggestions for improvement.

The test case effectively covers the custom separator functionality. The structure is consistent with the first test case, and error handling is properly implemented.

Consider the following improvements:

  1. Add a hover interaction test, similar to the first test case, to ensure consistency in testing across different configurations.
  2. Verify the presence of the custom separator to ensure it's correctly applied.

Example implementation:

test('自定义分隔符--UI截图', async ({ page }) => {
  page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull())
  await page.goto('breadcrumb#separator')
  const demo = page.locator('#separator .pc-demo')
  await expect(demo).toBeInViewport()
  
  // Verify the presence of the custom separator
  await expect(demo.locator('.custom-separator')).toBeVisible()
  
  // Capture the default state
  await expect(demo).toHaveScreenshot('separator-default.png')
  
  // Test hover state (assuming there's an interactive element)
  await demo.getByText('产品').hover()
  await expect(demo).toHaveScreenshot('separator-hover.png')
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 44a73ed and eb5cef1.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
  • tests/breadcrumb/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/base-chromium-win32.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • tests/breadcrumb/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/hover-chromium-win32.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • tests/breadcrumb/xdesign.spec.ts-snapshots/separator-chromium-win32.png is excluded by !**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/breadcrumb/xdesign.spec.ts (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +1 to +24
import { expect, test } from '@playwright/test'

test.describe('breadcrumb组件xdesign规范', () => {
test('默认--UI截图', async ({ page }) => {
page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull())
await page.goto('breadcrumb#base')
const demo = page.locator('#base .pc-demo')
await expect(demo).toBeInViewport()
await expect(demo).toHaveScreenshot('base.png')

// 关闭按钮hover状态
await demo.getByText('产品').hover()
await expect(demo).toBeInViewport()
await expect(demo).toHaveScreenshot('hover.png')
})

test('自定义分隔符--UI截图', async ({ page }) => {
page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull())
await page.goto('breadcrumb#separator')
const demo = page.locator('#separator .pc-demo')
await expect(demo).toBeInViewport()
await expect(demo).toHaveScreenshot('separator.png')
})
})
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider expanding test coverage for comprehensive validation.

The current test file provides good coverage for basic functionality of the breadcrumb component. To further improve the robustness of the tests, consider adding the following test cases:

  1. Test for dynamic breadcrumb updates (if applicable).
  2. Verify correct linking/navigation when clicking on breadcrumb items.
  3. Test for proper truncation or wrapping of long breadcrumb paths.
  4. Verify accessibility features (e.g., proper ARIA attributes, keyboard navigation).
  5. Test responsiveness by checking appearance at different viewport sizes.

Example of an additional test case:

test('Breadcrumb navigation--UI and functionality', async ({ page }) => {
  page.on('pageerror', (exception) => expect(exception).toBeNull())
  await page.goto('breadcrumb#navigation')
  const demo = page.locator('#navigation .pc-demo')
  
  // Check initial state
  await expect(demo).toBeInViewport()
  await expect(demo).toHaveScreenshot('navigation-initial.png')
  
  // Click on a breadcrumb item
  await demo.getByText('Products').click()
  
  // Verify URL change (adjust the expected URL as needed)
  await expect(page).toHaveURL(/.*\/products/)
  
  // Verify updated breadcrumb state
  await expect(demo).toHaveScreenshot('navigation-after-click.png')
})

These additional tests will help ensure the breadcrumb component functions correctly across various scenarios and user interactions.

@zzcr zzcr merged commit 867b32a into dev Sep 29, 2024
2 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2024
13 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Oct 11, 2024
13 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
e2e playwright
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant