Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci(unit-test): [alert,badge] add unit test actions #2682

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

zzcr
Copy link
Member

@zzcr zzcr commented Dec 19, 2024

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new GitHub Actions workflow for automating unit testing of pull requests.
    • The workflow extracts component names from pull request titles to run relevant tests.
  • Documentation

    • Updated artifacts to include warnings and pull request details for better tracking.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@zzcr has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 3 minutes and 39 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e4eb610 and 3e2ef5d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/test-unit-pr.yml (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow file test-unit-pr.yml to automate unit testing for pull requests. The workflow triggers on specific pull request events, parsing components from the pull request title, and executing tests based on the identified components. It consists of two primary jobs: parse-components, which extracts and validates component names, and pr-test, which runs the tests for the identified components, including error handling and artifact generation.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/test-unit-pr.yml New GitHub Actions workflow for automated unit testing on pull requests

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ci, e2e-test

Suggested reviewers

  • kagol

Poem

🐰 Hopping through code with glee,
Testing PRs, setting workflows free!
Components parsed, tests in flight,
Automation brings such delight!
Rabbit's CI magic takes its leap! 🚀


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/test-unit-pr.yml (2)

30-33: Document component limit and consider relaxing naming restrictions.

The current implementation has two undocumented limitations:

  1. Only 3 components maximum are allowed (.slice(0, 3))
  2. Component names are restricted to lowercase letters, hyphens, and forward slashes

Consider:

  • Documenting these limitations in the warning message
  • Evaluating if the naming pattern is too restrictive for your components

35-44: Fix warning message formatting and enhance documentation.

The warning message has inconsistent indentation and could be more informative.

-              const warningString =`**[e2e-test-warn]**
-              The component to be tested is missing.
-
-              The title of the Pull request should look like "fix(vue-renderless): [action-menu, alert] fix xxx bug".
-              
-              Please make sure you've read our [contributing guide](https://github.com/opentiny/tiny-vue/blob/dev/CONTRIBUTING.md)
+              const warningString = `**[e2e-test-warn]**
+The component to be tested is missing.
+
+Requirements:
+- PR title format: "type(scope): [component1, component2] description"
+- Maximum 3 components allowed
+- Component names must use lowercase letters, hyphens, and forward slashes
+
+Example: "fix(vue-renderless): [action-menu, alert] fix xxx bug"
+
+Please read our [contributing guide](https://github.com/opentiny/tiny-vue/blob/dev/CONTRIBUTING.md)
`
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 39-39: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8d0429d and 6985dd2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/test-unit-pr.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/test-unit-pr.yml

20-20: the runner of "actions/github-script@v6" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


73-73: property "testclis" is not defined in object type {testcomponents: string}

(expression)


81-81: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


86-86: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


91-91: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:45: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


94-94: the runner of "actions/cache@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/test-unit-pr.yml

[error] 39-39: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/test-unit-pr.yml (1)

1-10: LGTM! Well-configured workflow triggers and concurrency settings.

The workflow is properly configured to run on relevant PR events with appropriate concurrency control to prevent parallel runs.

Comment on lines +20 to +21
uses: actions/github-script@v6
with:
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Update actions/github-script to latest version.

The current version @v6 is outdated. Update to the latest version to ensure security and feature improvements.

-        uses: actions/github-script@v6
+        uses: actions/github-script@v7
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
uses: actions/github-script@v6
with:
uses: actions/github-script@v7
with:
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

20-20: the runner of "actions/github-script@v6" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

Comment on lines +102 to +104
- name: Install dependencies
run: pnpm i --no-frozen-lockfile

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Use frozen lockfile in CI environment.

For reproducible builds in CI, you should use --frozen-lockfile flag with pnpm install.

-        run: pnpm i --no-frozen-lockfile
+        run: pnpm i --frozen-lockfile
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Install dependencies
run: pnpm i --no-frozen-lockfile
- name: Install dependencies
run: pnpm i --frozen-lockfile

Comment on lines +81 to +89
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- name: Setup pnpm
uses: pnpm/action-setup@v2

- name: Setup node
uses: actions/setup-node@v3
with:
node-version: 20
- name: Get pnpm store directory
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Update GitHub Actions to latest versions.

Several actions are using outdated versions:

-      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
+      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
       - name: Setup pnpm
        uses: pnpm/action-setup@v2
       - name: Setup node
-        uses: actions/setup-node@v3
+        uses: actions/setup-node@v4
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- uses: actions/checkout@v3
- name: Setup pnpm
uses: pnpm/action-setup@v2
- name: Setup node
uses: actions/setup-node@v3
with:
node-version: 20
- name: Get pnpm store directory
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Setup pnpm
uses: pnpm/action-setup@v2
- name: Setup node
uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: 20
- name: Get pnpm store directory
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

81-81: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


86-86: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

Comment on lines 71 to 74
strategy:
matrix:
testcli: ${{ fromJson(needs.parse-components.outputs.testclis) }}

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix undefined matrix strategy configuration.

The matrix configuration references testclis which is not defined in the outputs of the parse-components job.

-    strategy:
-      matrix:
-        testcli: ${{ fromJson(needs.parse-components.outputs.testclis) }}

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

73-73: property "testclis" is not defined in object type {testcomponents: string}

(expression)

Comment on lines 105 to 106
- name: E2E unit
run: pnpm test:unit3 ${{ env.TEST_COMPONENTS }}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling and artifact upload for test results.

The test command should handle errors and upload test results as artifacts for debugging.

       - name: E2E unit
-        run: pnpm test:unit3 ${{ env.TEST_COMPONENTS }}
+        run: |
+          pnpm test:unit3 ${{ env.TEST_COMPONENTS }} || {
+            echo "Tests failed. Uploading test results..."
+            exit 1
+          }
+      - name: Upload test results
+        if: always()
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+        with:
+          name: test-results
+          path: |
+            coverage/
+            test-results/
+          retention-days: 5
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: E2E unit
run: pnpm test:unit3 ${{ env.TEST_COMPONENTS }}
- name: E2E unit
run: |
pnpm test:unit3 ${{ env.TEST_COMPONENTS }} || {
echo "Tests failed. Uploading test results..."
exit 1
}
- name: Upload test results
if: always()
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
with:
name: test-results
path: |
coverage/
test-results/
retention-days: 5

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/test-unit-pr.yml (2)

32-33: Document the component limit.

The code limits components to 3 without explanation. Consider adding a comment explaining this limitation.

+              // Limit to 3 components to prevent excessive test runs
               components = [...new Set(components)].slice(0, 3).join(' ')

4-5: Consider adding pull_request_target restrictions.

For security, consider restricting the workflow to run only on pull requests from trusted contributors or add appropriate permissions.

 on:
-  pull_request:
+  pull_request_target:
+    paths:
+      - 'src/**'
+      - 'test/**'
     types: [opened, reopened, synchronize, edited]
+
+permissions:
+  contents: read
+  pull-requests: write
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6985dd2 and e4eb610.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/test-unit-pr.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/test-unit-pr.yml

20-20: the runner of "actions/github-script@v6" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


73-73: property "testclis" is not defined in object type {testcomponents: string}

(expression)


81-81: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


86-86: the runner of "actions/setup-node@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


91-91: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:45: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting

(shellcheck)


94-94: the runner of "actions/cache@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/test-unit-pr.yml

[error] 39-39: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/test-unit-pr.yml (4)

1-10: LGTM! Well-configured workflow triggers and concurrency settings.

The workflow is properly configured with:

  • Appropriate PR event triggers
  • Concurrency control to prevent parallel runs
  • Clear naming convention

20-21: Update actions/github-script to latest version.

The current version @v6 is outdated.

-        uses: actions/github-script@v6
+        uses: actions/github-script@v7
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

20-20: the runner of "actions/github-script@v6" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)


71-74: Fix undefined matrix strategy configuration.

The matrix configuration references testclis which is not defined in the outputs.

-    strategy:
-      matrix:
-        testcli: ${{ fromJson(needs.parse-components.outputs.testclis) }}
+    strategy:
+      matrix:
+        testcli: ${{ fromJson(needs.parse-components.outputs.testComponents) }}
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

73-73: property "testclis" is not defined in object type {testcomponents: string}

(expression)


105-106: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add error handling and test results reporting.

The test command should handle errors and provide detailed test results.

       - name: Unit Test
-        run: pnpm test:unit3 ${{ env.TEST_COMPONENTS }}
+        id: unit-test
+        continue-on-error: true
+        run: |
+          pnpm test:unit3 ${{ env.TEST_COMPONENTS }} | tee test-output.log
+          exit ${PIPESTATUS[0]}
+
+      - name: Upload test results
+        if: always()
+        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
+        with:
+          name: test-results
+          path: |
+            test-output.log
+            coverage/
+          retention-days: 5
+
+      - name: Check test status
+        if: steps.unit-test.outcome == 'failure'
+        run: exit 1

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

Comment on lines 30 to 31
.filter((c) => /^[a-z\-\/]+$/.test(c))
.map((c) => `"\\/${c}\\/"`)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Strengthen component name validation.

The current regex /^[a-z\-\/]+$/ is too permissive and could allow invalid component names.

-                .filter((c) => /^[a-z\-\/]+$/.test(c))
+                .filter((c) => /^[a-z][a-z0-9\-\/]{2,}$/.test(c))
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
.filter((c) => /^[a-z\-\/]+$/.test(c))
.map((c) => `"\\/${c}\\/"`)
.filter((c) => /^[a-z][a-z0-9\-\/]{2,}$/.test(c))
.map((c) => `"\\/${c}\\/"`)

@zzcr zzcr changed the title ci(unit-test): [alert] add unit test actions ci(unit-test): [alert,badge] add unit test actions Dec 19, 2024
@kagol kagol merged commit 4d51590 into dev Dec 25, 2024
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants