Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 29, 2022. It is now read-only.

Ideal data model missing: reviewer? #18

Open
roll opened this issue Sep 13, 2015 · 1 comment
Open

Ideal data model missing: reviewer? #18

roll opened this issue Sep 13, 2015 · 1 comment
Milestone

Comments

@roll
Copy link

roll commented Sep 13, 2015

Background
Related to #21 issue.

Topic
Cochrane database has an entity Reviewer. Reviewer reviews Report (m2m relation). I guess Report is a Review (ResultsDoc) on our language.
Example value:

35;"Dr";"Bernardo";"Garcia de Oliveira Soares";"";"BGOS";"";"Universidade Federal de Pelotas";"Evidence Based Medicine Center";"";"[email protected]";"";"Av. Duque de Caxias, 250";"";"Pelotas";"RS";"BRAZIL";"96100";"Rua Quinze de Novembro 1081";"";"Pelotas";"RS";"BRAZIL";"96015-000";"+55 532 221739";"+55 53 9810298";"";"";"";"";"+55 532 712645";"";"";"";"";FALSE;FALSE;"2001-02-13 00:00:00";"2003-03-06 00:00:00";"";"012"
@pwalsh pwalsh modified the milestone: 2015-09-14 Sep 14, 2015
@roll roll modified the milestones: Backlog, 2015-09-14 Sep 14, 2015
@danfowler
Copy link

@roll A Review is a Systematic Review, a meta-analysis of a collection of "studies" in tblStudy. These are in tblReview not tblReport. Reviews can provide the "risk of bias" score mentioned in the trial page mock.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants