Add test to format GTFS API schema

[optionsome]

Summary

Adds a test that formats GTFS API schema.

Issue

No issue

Unit tests

Formatting is done and checked through a test.

Documentation

Not needed

Changelog

Not sure if needed

[leonardehrenfried]

You can use the ResourceLoader for this.

[optionsome]

Ok thanks, I thought there was a better way to do this. I Copied the approach I used from the transmodel test.

[optionsome]

I tried using it but it's not currently usable for writing to files.

[optionsome]

This is one approach we can use to apply formatting to the GTFS GraphQL schema. However, we can discuss if this is the best approach or are there other alternatives. Personally I would like the schema to have slightly more space between fields etc. Haven't thought too deeply about the ordering.

Note, I haven't yet actually read through the whole schema to figure out if this somehow created some breaking changes. I at least noticed that this now exposes some of the native GraphQL directives through the schema. My instinct is that this is probably a good thing.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.45%. Comparing base (23f04a0) to head (2123d64).

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             dev-2.x    #5482      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      69.45%   69.45%   -0.01%     
+ Complexity     17070    17069       -1     
=============================================
  Files           1937     1937              
  Lines          73692    73692              
  Branches        7540     7540              
=============================================
- Hits           51184    51182       -2     
- Misses         19880    19881       +1     
- Partials        2628     2629       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[optionsome]

Another thing to consider, maybe we should include the formatting commit in https://github.com/opentripplanner/OpenTripPlanner/blob/dev-2.x/.git-blame-ignore-revs . However, it also did some other stuff than formatting which I could potentially split out to another commit.

[optionsome]

This is waiting for #5185 to be merged.

[optionsome]

This is now ready for review.

[t2gran]

The order is strange, looked it up in the SchemaPrinter:

• query
• directive
• object
• enum
• scalar
• interface
• union
• input

Can not see that it is possible to configure it.