Skip to content

Conversation

csviri
Copy link
Collaborator

@csviri csviri commented Sep 13, 2025

TODO:

  • relation for ready condition, should we put also there?

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 13, 2025
@csviri csviri mentioned this pull request Sep 13, 2025
@csviri csviri linked an issue Sep 13, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@csviri csviri changed the title feat: expectation pattern support [WIP] feat: expectation pattern support Sep 22, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 25, 2025
Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <[email protected]>
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 29, 2025
Signed-off-by: Attila Mészáros <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support for expectations pattern
2 participants